[PATCH 1/1] Revert "arm64: Layerscape: Survive LPI one-way reset

Michael Walle michael at walle.cc
Sun Oct 24 20:02:24 CEST 2021

>On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 01:22:10PM +0530, Rayagonda Kokatanur wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 11:29 AM Priyanka Jain (OSS)
>> <priyanka.jain at oss.nxp.com> wrote:


>> > Tom,
>> >
>> > I agree that bindings patch is essential for device-tree changes.
>> > But merging this patch will break Layerscape Platforms.
>> > We have requested Rayagonda to submit Binding patch to upstream for review.
>> >
>> > If first patch of binding gets submitted timely, can we defer this patch.
>> >
>> >  Regards
>> > Priyanka
>> >
>> ++Bharat, Roman and Henrik.
> Yes, please keep me in the loop on this binding being reviewed upstream.
> Also, please check the tree for other bindings that haven't been
> submitted, but also haven't been noticed yet.  There is not supposed to
> be anything outside of the -u-boot.dtsi files that can't be replaced by
> dropping in a newer set of upstream dts files.  And the -u-boot.dtsi
> files are for u-boot specific bindings (that we're working on
> upstreaming) or actively in-review bindings upstream.

Are there any news on this topic? Was there a submission to linux for the
binding in the meantime? Unfortunately, I wasn't in the loop here (albeit
being the Reported-by: one). Until now, this patch is a prerequisite for my
ls1028a device tree sync series [1].


[1] https://lore.kernel.org/u-boot/20211013161427.612033-1-michael@walle.cc/

More information about the U-Boot mailing list