[PATCH 1/1] blk: simplify blk_get_devnum_by_typename()
Simon Glass
sjg at chromium.org
Mon Oct 25 17:18:49 CEST 2021
Hi Heinrich,
On Mon, 25 Oct 2021 at 02:00, Heinrich Schuchardt
<heinrich.schuchardt at canonical.com> wrote:
>
> On 10/25/21 09:54, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> > On 10/24/21 21:54, Simon Glass wrote:
> >> Hi Heinrich,
> >>
> >> On Sat, 23 Oct 2021 at 08:06, Heinrich Schuchardt
> >> <heinrich.schuchardt at canonical.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> The block descriptor contains the if_type. There is no need to first
> >>> look
> >>> up the uclass for the if_type and then to check the parent device's
> >>> uclass
> >>> to know if the device has the correct if_type.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt at canonical.com>
> >>> ---
> >>> drivers/block/blk-uclass.c | 35 +----------------------------------
> >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 34 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> This seems to be heading in the wrong direction though.
> >>
> >> The IF_TYPE should really go away and be replaced with the UCLASS ID,
> >> I think.
> >>
> >> At present we have lots of calls to blk_create_device_f() which
> >> specify the type. I think we should drop the IF_TYPE_.. arg to that
> >> function and have it figured out from the uclass, in the interim.
> >>
> >> But why do we need IF_TYPE now?
> >
> > I admit that this patch is just an intermediate step.
> >
> > We can replace IF_TYPE by ULASS ID once SPL block devices are always
> > using the driver model. Have we reached this point yet? I have not seen
> > drivers/block/blk_legacy.c being deleted.
>
> qemu_malta64, qemu_malta64el, qemu_malta, qemu_maltael are examples of
> defconfigs requiring drivers/block/blk_legacy.c
Yes, we seem to have BLK on only for MMC and USB, but malta64 (for
example) uses IDE.
The problem seems to be HAVE_BLOCK_DEVICE which should not be used.
+Tom Rini
Should we remove HAVE_BLOCK_DEVICE at this point, or make it depend on BROKEN?
>
> Best regards
>
> Heinrich
>
> >
> > Removing if_type_uclass_id[] is anyway on the right path.
Are you sure? Instead, could we use the uclass ID in more places?
Regards,
Simon
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list