[RFC PATCH v2] clk: fix clk_get_rate() always return ulong

[Julien Masson]

Hi Simon,

On Tue 30 Aug 2022 at 10:32, Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org> wrote:

> Hi Julien,
> 
> On Mon, 29 Aug 2022 at 06:06, Julien Masson <jmasson at baylibre.com> wrote:
>>
>> According to clk_ops struct definition, the callback `get_rate()`
>> return current clock rate value as ulong.
>> `clk_get_rate()` should handle the clock rate returned as ulong also.
>>
>> Otherwise we may have invalid/truncated clock rate value returned by
>> `clk_get_rate()`.
>>
>> `log_ret` has also been removed since it use an `int` in the macro
>> definition.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Julien Masson <jmasson at baylibre.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/clk/clk-uclass.c | 8 ++------
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org>
Thanks for the review, I appreciate it.

> 
> I would prefer to create a new log_rete() to handle this, with a long
> argument and return value. But this is OK, I suppose.
Yes and I guess that could be used in other functions in clk-uclass.c

> 
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-uclass.c b/drivers/clk/clk-uclass.c
>> index b89c77bf79..c351fa97d1 100644
>> --- a/drivers/clk/clk-uclass.c
>> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk-uclass.c
>> @@ -469,7 +469,7 @@ void clk_free(struct clk *clk)
>> ulong clk_get_rate(struct clk *clk)
>> {
>> const struct clk_ops *ops;
>> -       int ret;
>> +       ulong ret;
>>
>> debug("%s(clk=%p)\n", __func__, clk);
>> if (!clk_valid(clk))
>> @@ -479,11 +479,7 @@ ulong clk_get_rate(struct clk *clk)
>> if (!ops->get_rate)
>> return -ENOSYS;
>>
>> -       ret = ops->get_rate(clk);
>> -       if (ret)
>> -               return log_ret(ret);
>> -
>> -       return 0;
>> +       return ops->get_rate(clk);
>> }
>>
>> struct clk *clk_get_parent(struct clk *clk)
>> --
>> 2.37.2
>>
> 
> Regards,
> Simon

-- 
Julien Masson