[PATCH v2 2/2] ARM: imx: imx8mn-evk: use one common u-boot.dtsi for the evk boards

[Alper Nebi Yasak]

On 10/06/2022 00:38, Heiko Thiery wrote:
> Hi Tim, Hi Simon,
> 
> [SNIP]
> 
>>
>> Heiko,
>>
>> You can add multi-dtb support to this so that it's usable by the other
>> imx8mn boards with the following:
>> 
>> [...]
>> 
>> I don't mind sending this as a follow-up to your patch here.
> 
> Since this patch moves the parts from the 2 imx8mn-evk boards to one
> "common" file it would be better to do more changes on that in a
> separate patch.
> 
>> It looks like there are only the following boards in mainline that
>> would benefit from using this shared include:
>> imx8mn-beacon-kit-u-boot.dtsi
>> imx8mn-var-som-symphony-u-boot.dtsi
>> imx8mn-venice-u-boot.dtsi

There's also 'imx8mn-bsh-smm-s2-u-boot-common.dtsi'. Slightly different
because only half of the blobs are there with IMX8M_DDR3L.

>> Have you compared the binman portions of imx8m{m,n,p}-u-boot.dtsi?
> 
> No not yet.

I looked a bit and they look very much alike. I suspect it's possible to
eventually unify everything into a shared 'imx8m-u-boot.dtsi', but I
didn't actually try.

>> There are a lot of differences due to different property ordering and
>> label/node naming conventions. I would like to see these normalized
>> but i'm not clear which is the best example to normalize to.
>> Specifically I don't know:
>> 1. what is the convention for property ordering in dt... is it simply
>> alphabetical order?

AFAIK property order doesn't matter for binman. Node order is very
significant though. For names, I think we should:

- Prefer hyphens to underscores
- Prefer lowercase to uppercase
- Prefer meaningful names to things like 'blob-ext at 1'
- Avoid first char being a number (because labels can't have that)

>> 2. have we settled on a convention for the blob naming, if so what is
>> the best example?

I had suggested 'ddr-1d-imem-fw' etc. on a series from Peng, see latest
version of it [1].

[1] arm: dts: imx8m: update binman ddr firmware node name
https://lore.kernel.org/u-boot/20220603071715.15212-4-peng.fan@oss.nxp.com/

> I am not aware that there is a conventional here. But maybe simon can
> give some hints here.
>