[PATCH v3 4/8] arm: mvebu: Use CONFIG_TIMER on all MVEBU & KIRKWOOD platforms
Pali Rohár
pali at kernel.org
Mon Nov 7 09:45:08 CET 2022
On Monday 07 November 2022 09:13:37 Stefan Roese wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> On 07.11.22 09:11, Chris Packham wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 7 Nov 2022, 7:23 PM Stefan Roese, <sr at denx.de
> > <mailto:sr at denx.de>> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Chris,
> >
> > On 05.11.22 05:08, Chris Packham wrote:
> > > On Sat, Nov 5, 2022 at 5:03 PM Chris Packham
> > <judge.packham at gmail.com <mailto:judge.packham at gmail.com>> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Hi Stefan,
> > >>
> > >> On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 2:23 AM Stefan Roese <sr at denx.de
> > <mailto:sr at denx.de>> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> Now that the new timer support is available for these
> > platforms, let's
> > >>> select this IF for all these platforms. This way it's not necessary
> > >>> that each board changes it's config header.
> > >>>
> > >>> Signed-off-by: Stefan Roese <sr at denx.de <mailto:sr at denx.de>>
> > >>> Tested-by: Tony Dinh <mibodhi at gmail.com <mailto:mibodhi at gmail.com>>
> > >>> ---
> > >>> v3:
> > >>> - No change
> > >>>
> > >>> v2:
> > >>> - No change
> > >>>
> > >>> arch/arm/Kconfig | 4 ++++
> > >>> arch/arm/mach-mvebu/include/mach/config.h | 5 -----
> > >>> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > >>>
> > >>> diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig
> > >>> index 82cd456f51f1..4ed100ab0ede 100644
> > >>> --- a/arch/arm/Kconfig
> > >>> +++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig
> > >>> @@ -618,6 +618,7 @@ config ARCH_KIRKWOOD
> > >>> select BOARD_EARLY_INIT_F
> > >>> select CPU_ARM926EJS
> > >>> select GPIO_EXTRA_HEADER
> > >>> + select TIMER
> > >>>
> > >>> config ARCH_MVEBU
> > >>> bool "Marvell MVEBU family (Armada XP/375/38x/3700/7K/8K)"
> > >>> @@ -629,6 +630,8 @@ config ARCH_MVEBU
> > >>> select GPIO_EXTRA_HEADER
> > >>> select SPL_DM_SPI if SPL
> > >>> select SPL_DM_SPI_FLASH if SPL
> > >>> + select SPL_TIMER if SPL
> > >>> + select TIMER
> > >>> select OF_CONTROL
> > >>> select OF_SEPARATE
> > >>> select SPI
> > >>> @@ -639,6 +642,7 @@ config ARCH_ORION5X
> > >>> select CPU_ARM926EJS
> > >>> select GPIO_EXTRA_HEADER
> > >>> select SPL_SEPARATE_BSS if SPL
> > >>> + select TIMER
> > >>>
> > >>> config TARGET_STV0991
> > >>> bool "Support stv0991"
> > >>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/include/mach/config.h
> > b/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/include/mach/config.h
> > >>> index 4add0d9e1030..9b5036c31dd3 100644
> > >>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/include/mach/config.h
> > >>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/include/mach/config.h
> > >>> @@ -41,9 +41,4 @@
> > >>> #endif
> > >>> #endif
> > >>>
> > >>> -/* Use common timer */
> > >>> -#define CONFIG_SYS_TIMER_COUNTS_DOWN
> > >>> -#define CONFIG_SYS_TIMER_COUNTER (MVEBU_TIMER_BASE + 0x14)
> > >>> -#define CONFIG_SYS_TIMER_RATE 25000000
> > >>> -
> > >>> #endif /* __MVEBU_CONFIG_H */
> > >>> --
> > >>> 2.37.3
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >> I think this may have broken the 64-bit mvebu SoCs (at least
> > reverting
> > >> it gets my AC5X series back to a working state). As far as I can
> > tell
> > >> none of them have anything that would bring in any timer driver.
> > >
> > > The following seems to sort things out without the need for a revert
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig
> > > index 710f171f87..e8968d61cd 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm/Kconfig
> > > +++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig
> > > @@ -640,7 +640,7 @@ config ARCH_MVEBU
> > > select SPL_DM_SPI if SPL
> > > select SPL_DM_SPI_FLASH if SPL
> > > select SPL_TIMER if SPL
> > > - select TIMER
> > > + select TIMER if !ARM64
> > > select OF_CONTROL
> > > select OF_SEPARATE
> > > select SPI
> > >
> > > I'll include it in the series I'm about to send.
> >
> > Thanks. Even though I wonder a bit that no other ARM64 Marvell user
> > stumbled over this yet.
> >
> >
> > Yeah I did wonder. I do have access to another less obscure Marvell
> > board at $dayjob. I'll see if I can confirm whether it needs the same
> > change or not.
>
> Cool, thanks. I'm running a CI build right now and will push your
> patches later today if all works fine.
>
> Thanks,
> Stefan
Sorry, I have not tested A3720 with all those changes. So I do not know.
I tested only A385 and it worked fine.
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list