[RFC PATCH v5 09/24] cli: Add menu for hush parser
Tom Rini
trini at konsulko.com
Tue Nov 8 16:21:29 CET 2022
On Mon, Nov 07, 2022 at 08:28:42AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Patrick,
>
> On Mon, 7 Nov 2022 at 05:32, Patrick DELAUNAY
> <patrick.delaunay at foss.st.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 11/1/22 20:20, Francis Laniel wrote:
> > > For the moment, the menu contains only entry: HUSH_OLD_PARSER which is the
> > > default.
> > > The goal is to prepare the field to add a new hush parser which guarantees
> > > actual behavior is still correct.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Francis Laniel <francis.laniel at amarulasolutions.com>
> > > ---
> > > cmd/Kconfig | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
> > > common/Makefile | 3 ++-
> > > 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/cmd/Kconfig b/cmd/Kconfig
> > > index 3f6bc70d43..c15d7c51f7 100644
> > > --- a/cmd/Kconfig
> > > +++ b/cmd/Kconfig
> > > @@ -23,6 +23,27 @@ config HUSH_PARSER
> > > If disabled, you get the old, much simpler behaviour with a somewhat
> > > smaller memory footprint.
> > >
> > > +menu "Hush flavor to use"
> > > + depends on HUSH_PARSER
> > > +
> > > + config HUSH_OLD_PARSER
> > > + bool "Use hush old parser"
> > > + default y
> > > + help
> > > + This option enables the old flavor of hush based on hush Busybox from
> > > + 2005.
> > > +
> > > + It is actually the default U-Boot shell when decided to use hush as shell.
> > > +
> > > + config HUSH_2021_PARSER
> > > + bool "Use hush 2021 parser"
> > > + help
> > > + This option enables the new flavor of hush based on hush Busybox from
> > > + 2021.
> > > +
> > > + For the moment, it is highly experimental and should be used at own risks.
> > > +endmenu
> > > +
> >
> >
> > I think "choice" can be made sense here
> >
> > => only one version is used
> >
> >
> > choice
> > prompt "Hush flavor to use"
> > default HUSH_OLD_PARSER
> >
> > depends on HUSH_PARSER
> >
> >
> > config HUSH_OLD_PARSER
> >
> > bool "Use hush old parser"
> >
> > config HUSH_2021_PARSER
> >
> > bool "Use hush 2021 parser"
> >
> > endchoice
>
> We need to be able to build both and then select the correct one at
> runtime, at least for sandbox. Otherwise we would need yet another
> sandbox build. So I think what we have here makes sense.
I think choice is fine, as that's for testing. Once we're ready to merge
this we'll not keep both around for long.
--
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 659 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20221108/c5516f96/attachment.sig>
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list