[PATCH] riscv: use imply instead of select for SPL_SEPARATE_BSS

[Zong Li]

On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 8:17 PM Zong Li <zong.li at sifive.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 12:00 PM Sean Anderson <seanga2 at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On 11/16/22 02:08, Zong Li wrote:
> > > Use imply instead of select, then it can still be disabled by
> > > board-specific defconfig, or be set to n manually.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Zong Li <zong.li at sifive.com>
> > > ---
> > >   arch/Kconfig | 2 +-
> > >   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/Kconfig b/arch/Kconfig
> > > index ae39716697..102956d24c 100644
> > > --- a/arch/Kconfig
> > > +++ b/arch/Kconfig
> > > @@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ config RISCV
> > >       select SUPPORT_OF_CONTROL
> > >       select OF_CONTROL
> > >       select DM
> > > -     select SPL_SEPARATE_BSS if SPL
> > > +     imply SPL_SEPARATE_BSS if SPL
> > >       imply DM_SERIAL
> > >       imply DM_ETH
> > >       imply DM_EVENT
> >
> > Do you have an example of a board which does this?
> >
>
> Hi Sean,
> We'd like to disable 'SPL_SEPARATE_BSS' on our internal platforms that
> don't exist in the mainline. It seems to me that using 'imply' might
> be not only working on the mainline's board, but also making it
> flexible to disable 'SPL_SEPARATE_BSS' by board-specific configuration
> or disable it manually for debug purposes. Hope the idea is good to
> you all. Thanks
>

Hi all,
Thanks for your reviewing, could I know whether this patch makes sense to you?

> > --Sean