[u-boot][PATCH 10/14] mtd: rawnand: omap_gpmc: support u-boot driver model
Adam Ford
aford173 at gmail.com
Tue Oct 11 17:01:04 CEST 2022
On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 6:52 AM Roger Quadros <rogerq at kernel.org> wrote:
>
> Adds driver model support.
>
> We need to be able to self initialize the NAND controller/chip
> at probe and so enable CONFIG_SYS_NAND_SELF_INIT.
>
> Doing so requires nand_register() API which is provided by nand.c
> and needs to be enabled during SPL build via CONFIG_SPL_NAND_INIT.
> But nand.c also provides nand_init() so we need to get rid of nand_init()
> in omap_gpmc driver if CONFIG_SPL_NAND_INIT is set.
>
> Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros <rogerq at kernel.org>
> ---
> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/Kconfig | 1 +
> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/omap_gpmc.c | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 2 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/Kconfig b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/Kconfig
> index bc5cabdfc2..1d23144ce4 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/Kconfig
> @@ -190,6 +190,7 @@ config NAND_LPC32XX_SLC
> config NAND_OMAP_GPMC
> bool "Support OMAP GPMC NAND controller"
> depends on ARCH_OMAP2PLUS || ARCH_KEYSTONE || ARCH_K3
> + select SYS_NAND_SELF_INIT if ARCH_K3
I have a question about this down below.
> help
> Enables omap_gpmc.c driver for OMAPx and AMxxxx platforms.
> GPMC controller is used for parallel NAND flash devices, and can
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/omap_gpmc.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/omap_gpmc.c
> index e772a914c8..7192ca9e5a 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/omap_gpmc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/omap_gpmc.c
> @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
> #include <common.h>
> #include <log.h>
> #include <asm/io.h>
> +#include <dm/uclass.h>
> #include <linux/errno.h>
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP2PLUS
> @@ -1121,7 +1122,7 @@ int __maybe_unused omap_nand_switch_ecc(uint32_t hardware, uint32_t eccstrength)
> * nand_scan about special functionality. See the defines for further
> * explanation
> */
> -int board_nand_init(struct nand_chip *nand)
> +int gpmc_nand_init(struct nand_chip *nand)
> {
> int32_t gpmc_config = 0;
> int cs = cs_next++;
> @@ -1201,3 +1202,55 @@ int board_nand_init(struct nand_chip *nand)
>
> return 0;
> }
> +
> +static struct nand_chip *nand_chip; /* First NAND chip for SPL use only */
> +
> +#if CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(SYS_NAND_SELF_INIT)
> +
> +static int gpmc_nand_probe(struct udevice *dev)
> +{
> + struct nand_chip *nand = dev_get_priv(dev);
> + struct mtd_info *mtd = nand_to_mtd(nand);
> + int ret;
> +
> + gpmc_nand_init(nand);
> +
> + ret = nand_scan(mtd, CONFIG_SYS_NAND_MAX_CHIPS);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + ret = nand_register(0, mtd);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + if (!nand_chip)
> + nand_chip = nand;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct udevice_id gpmc_nand_ids[] = {
> + { .compatible = "ti,am64-nand" },
> + { .compatible = "ti,omap2-nand" },
The gpmc_nand_ids reference to omap2, but it's encapsulated inside the
SYS_NAND_SELF_INIT ifdef which appears to only be set if K3. Should
this code be expected to work on OMAP2? I don't think K3 is set for
OMAP2+. If so, should the SYS_NAND_SELF_INIT be selected if OMAP2 is
selected?
I have a DM3730 that I can test with this. Do you have a repo I can
point to to test? If not, I'll pull the series from patchwork, but I
need to know what branch to use as a starting point.
thanks,
adam
> + { }
> +};
> +
> +U_BOOT_DRIVER(gpmc_nand) = {
> + .name = "gpmc-nand",
> + .id = UCLASS_MTD,
> + .of_match = gpmc_nand_ids,
> + .probe = gpmc_nand_probe,
> + .priv_auto = sizeof(struct nand_chip),
> +};
> +
> +void board_nand_init(void)
> +{
> + struct udevice *dev;
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = uclass_get_device_by_driver(UCLASS_MTD,
> + DM_DRIVER_GET(gpmc_nand), &dev);
> + if (ret && ret != -ENODEV)
> + pr_err("%s: Failed to get GPMC device: %d\n", __func__, ret);
> +}
> +#endif /* CONFIG_SYS_NAND_SELF_INIT */
> --
> 2.17.1
>
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list