[PATCH] tests: Build correct sandbox configuration on 32bit
Heinrich Schuchardt
xypron.glpk at gmx.de
Sat Oct 15 07:05:39 CEST 2022
On 10/14/22 17:56, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Michal,
>
> On Thu, 13 Oct 2022 at 14:29, Michal Suchanek <msuchanek at suse.de> wrote:
>>
>> Currently sandbox configuration defautls to 64bit and there is no
>> automation for building 32bit sandbox on 32bit hosts.
>>
>> cpp does not know about target specification, code needs to be compiled
>> to determine integer width.
>>
>> Add a test program that prints the integer width, and a make target that
>> aligns the sandbox configuration with the result.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Michal Suchanek <msuchanek at suse.de>
>> ---
>>
>> Makefile | 6 ++++++
>> doc/arch/sandbox.rst | 16 +++++++++++-----
>> test/py/conftest.py | 1 +
>> tools/Makefile | 2 ++
>> tools/bits-per-long.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
>> 5 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>> create mode 100644 tools/bits-per-long.c
>
> This needs to be automatic, so that it builds the 32-bit version on
> 32-bit hosts, 64-bit version on 64-bit hosts.
We should be able to test the following:
* 64bit phys_addr_t on ilp32.
* 32bit phys_addr_t on ilp32.
* 64bit phys_addr_t on lp64.
Gitlab CI currently tests:
* 64bit phys_addr_t on lp64.
* 32bit phys_addr_t on lp64.
Best regards
Heinrich
>
> See here for my attempt. I suspect it just needs your bits_per_long
> thing brought in, but in any case I hope it gives you inspiration.
>
> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/patch/20220123195514.3152022-4-sjg@chromium.org/
>
> Basically we should be able to build sandbox on any platform and it
> should just work, without manual configuration.
>
> Regards,
> Simon
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list