[PATCH v14 02/15] FWU: Add FWU metadata structure and driver for accessing metadata

Sughosh Ganu sughosh.ganu at linaro.org
Thu Oct 20 06:45:16 CEST 2022


hi Ilias,

On Thu, 20 Oct 2022 at 01:26, Ilias Apalodimas
<ilias.apalodimas at linaro.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Sughosh
>
>
> [...]
>
> > + *
> > + * Read both the metadata copies from the storage media, verify their checksum,
> > + * and ascertain that both copies match. If one of the copies has gone bad,
> > + * restore it from the good copy.
> > + *
> > + * Return: 0 if OK, -ve on error
> > + *
> > + */
> > +int fwu_check_mdata_validity(void)
> > +{
> > +     int ret;
> > +     struct udevice *dev;
> > +     struct fwu_mdata pri_mdata;
> > +     struct fwu_mdata secondary_mdata;
> > +     uint mdata_parts[2];
> > +     uint valid_partitions, invalid_partitions;
> > +
> > +     ret = fwu_get_dev_mdata(&dev, NULL);
> > +     if (ret)
> > +             return ret;
> > +
> > +     /*
> > +      * Check if the platform has defined its own
> > +      * function to check the metadata partitions'
> > +      * validity. If so, that takes precedence.
> > +      */
> > +     ret = fwu_mdata_check(dev);
>
> Isn't this a bit dangerous?  Let's say a device defines it's own check
> function but for some reason returns -ENOSYS.  I am wondering if we should
> just return 0 if the platform defined functions aren't defined.

A driver should return ENOSYS only if a driver method has not been
defined. That is what I see being used in other drivers as well. So I
think that the current implementation of returning ENOSYS for a non
defined method is correct. If a driver is returning ENOSYS for any
other purpose I feel that should be fixed instead.

>
> > +     if (!ret || ret != -ENOSYS)
> > +             return ret;
> > +
> > +     /*
> > +      * Two FWU metadata partitions are expected.
> > +      * If we don't have two, user needs to create
> > +      * them first
> > +      */
> > +     valid_partitions = 0;
> > +     ret = fwu_get_mdata_part_num(dev, mdata_parts);
> > +     if (ret < 0) {
> > +             log_debug("Error getting the FWU metadata partitions\n");
> > +             return -ENOENT;
> > +     }
> > +
> > +     ret = fwu_read_mdata_partition(dev, &pri_mdata, mdata_parts[0]);
> > +     if (!ret) {
> > +             ret = fwu_verify_mdata(&pri_mdata, 1);
> > +             if (!ret)
> > +                     valid_partitions |= PRIMARY_PART;
> > +     }
> > +
> > +     ret = fwu_read_mdata_partition(dev, &secondary_mdata, mdata_parts[1]);
> > +     if (!ret) {
> > +             ret = fwu_verify_mdata(&secondary_mdata, 0);
> > +             if (!ret)
> > +                     valid_partitions |= SECONDARY_PART;
> > +     }
> > +
> > +     if (valid_partitions == (PRIMARY_PART | SECONDARY_PART)) {
> > +             /*
> > +              * Before returning, check that both the
> > +              * FWU metadata copies are the same. If not,
> > +              * the FWU metadata copies need to be
> > +              * re-populated.
> > +              */
> > +             if (!memcmp(&pri_mdata, &secondary_mdata,
> > +                         sizeof(struct fwu_mdata))) {
> > +                     ret = 0;
> > +             } else {
> > +                     log_info("Both FWU metadata copies are valid but do not match. Please check!\n");
>
> Check what ? Just remove that part please

Okay. I will restore the secondary partition from the primary
partition as Etienne has suggested.

>
> > +                     ret = -1;
> > +             }
> > +             goto out;
> > +     }
> > +
> > +     if (!(valid_partitions & BOTH_PARTS)) {
> > +             ret = -1;
>
> In general we should try to avoid returning -1 etc.  Is there an errno that
> would make sense?

Even I am not sure what is relevant here(EINVAL?). I think I can add a
log_info mentioning the error case?

>
> > +             goto out;
> > +     }
> > +
> > +     invalid_partitions = valid_partitions ^ BOTH_PARTS;
> > +     ret = fwu_write_mdata_partition(dev,
> > +                                     (invalid_partitions == PRIMARY_PART) ?
> > +                                     &secondary_mdata : &pri_mdata,
> > +                                     (invalid_partitions == PRIMARY_PART) ?
> > +                                     mdata_parts[0] : mdata_parts[1]);
> > +
> > +     if (ret < 0)
> > +             log_info("Restoring %s FWU metadata partition failed\n",
> > +                       (invalid_partitions == PRIMARY_PART) ?
> > +                       "primary" : "secondary");
> > +
> > +out:
> > +     return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * fwu_get_active_index() - Get active_index from the FWU metadata
> > + * @active_idx: active_index value to be read
> > + *
> > + * Read the active_index field from the FWU metadata and place it in
> > + * the variable pointed to be the function argument.
> > + *
> > + * Return: 0 if OK, -ve on error
> > + *
> > + */
> > +int fwu_get_active_index(uint *active_idx)
> > +{
> > +     int ret;
> > +     struct udevice *dev;
> > +     struct fwu_mdata mdata = { 0 };
> > +
> > +     ret = fwu_get_dev_mdata(&dev, &mdata);
> > +     if (ret)
> > +             return ret;
> > +
> > +     /*
> > +      * Found the FWU metadata partition, now read the active_index
> > +      * value
> > +      */
> > +     *active_idx = mdata.active_index;
> > +     if (*active_idx >= CONFIG_FWU_NUM_BANKS) {
> > +             log_debug("Active index value read is incorrect\n");
> > +             ret = -EINVAL;
> > +     }
> > +
> > +     return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * fwu_set_active_index() - Set active_index in the FWU metadata
> > + * @active_idx: active_index value to be set
> > + *
> > + * Update the active_index field in the FWU metadata
> > + *
> > + * Return: 0 if OK, -ve on error
> > + *
> > + */
> > +int fwu_set_active_index(uint active_idx)
> > +{
> > +     int ret;
> > +     struct udevice *dev;
> > +     struct fwu_mdata mdata = { 0 };
> > +
> > +     if (active_idx >= CONFIG_FWU_NUM_BANKS) {
> > +             log_debug("Invalid active index value\n");
> > +             return -EINVAL;
> > +     }
> > +
> > +     ret = fwu_get_dev_mdata(&dev, &mdata);
> > +     if (ret)
> > +             return ret;
> > +
> > +     /*
> > +      * Update the active index and previous_active_index fields
> > +      * in the FWU metadata
> > +      */
> > +     mdata.previous_active_index = mdata.active_index;
> > +     mdata.active_index = active_idx;
> > +
> > +     /*
> > +      * Now write this updated FWU metadata to both the
> > +      * FWU metadata partitions
> > +      */
> > +     ret = fwu_update_mdata(dev, &mdata);
> > +     if (ret) {
> > +             log_debug("Failed to update FWU metadata partitions\n");
> > +             ret = -EIO;
> > +     }
> > +
> > +     return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * fwu_get_image_index() - Get the Image Index to be used for capsule update
> > + * @image_index: The Image Index for the image
> > + *
> > + * The FWU multi bank update feature computes the value of image_index at
> > + * runtime, based on the bank to which the image needs to be written to.
> > + * Derive the image_index value for the image.
> > + *
> > + * Currently, the capsule update driver uses the DFU framework for
> > + * the updates. This function gets the DFU alt number which is to
> > + * be used as the Image Index
> > + *
> > + * Return: 0 if OK, -ve on error
> > + *
> > + */
> > +int fwu_get_image_index(u8 *image_index)
> > +{
> > +     int ret, i;
> > +     u8 alt_num;
> > +     uint update_bank;
> > +     efi_guid_t *image_guid, image_type_id;
> > +     struct udevice *dev;
> > +     struct fwu_mdata mdata = { 0 };
> > +     struct fwu_image_entry *img_entry;
> > +     struct fwu_image_bank_info *img_bank_info;
> > +
> > +     ret = fwu_get_dev_mdata(&dev, &mdata);
> > +     if (ret)
> > +             return ret;
> > +
> > +     ret = fwu_plat_get_update_index(&update_bank);
> > +     if (ret) {
> > +             log_debug("Failed to get the FWU update bank\n");
> > +             goto out;
> > +     }
> > +
> > +     ret = fwu_get_image_type_id(image_index, &image_type_id);
> > +     if (ret) {
> > +             log_debug("Unable to get image_type_id for image_index %u\n",
> > +                       *image_index);
> > +             goto out;
> > +     }
> > +
> > +     ret = -EINVAL;
> > +     /*
> > +      * The FWU metadata has been read. Now get the image_uuid for the
> > +      * image with the update_bank.
> > +      */
> > +     for (i = 0; i < CONFIG_FWU_NUM_IMAGES_PER_BANK; i++) {
> > +             if (!guidcmp(&image_type_id,
> > +                          &mdata.img_entry[i].image_type_uuid)) {
>
> can we invert the check with a 'continue' here?  Will save us one level of
> indentation

Hmm, yeah. I know it's subjective, but I personally find the current
code flow easier to follow. Moreover, the current code is not breaking
the 80 column rule. If you don't have a strong opinion about this, I
will prefer to keep it this way.

>
> > +                     img_entry = &mdata.img_entry[i];
> > +                     img_bank_info = &img_entry->img_bank_info[update_bank];
> > +                     image_guid = &img_bank_info->image_uuid;
> > +                     ret = fwu_plat_get_alt_num(dev, image_guid, &alt_num);
> > +                     if (ret) {
> > +                             log_debug("alt_num not found for partition with GUID %pUs\n",
> > +                                       image_guid);
> > +                     } else {
> > +                             log_debug("alt_num %d for partition %pUs\n",
> > +                                       alt_num, image_guid);
> > +                             *image_index = alt_num + 1;
> > +                     }
> > +
> > +                     goto out;
> > +             }
> > +     }
> > +
> > +     log_debug("Partition with the image type %pUs not found\n",
> > +               &image_type_id);
> > +
> > +out:
> > +     return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/**
>
> [...]
>
> > +static int fwu_clrset_image_accept(efi_guid_t *img_type_id, u32 bank, u8 action)
> > +{
> > +     int ret, i;
> > +     struct udevice *dev;
> > +     struct fwu_mdata mdata = { 0 };
> > +     struct fwu_image_entry *img_entry;
> > +     struct fwu_image_bank_info *img_bank_info;
> > +
> > +     ret = fwu_get_dev_mdata(&dev, &mdata);
> > +     if (ret)
> > +             return ret;
> > +
> > +     img_entry = &mdata.img_entry[0];
> > +     for (i = 0; i < CONFIG_FWU_NUM_IMAGES_PER_BANK; i++) {
> > +             if (!guidcmp(&img_entry[i].image_type_uuid, img_type_id)) {
> > +                     img_bank_info = &img_entry[i].img_bank_info[bank];
> > +                     if (action == IMAGE_ACCEPT_SET)
> > +                             img_bank_info->accepted |= FWU_IMAGE_ACCEPTED;
> > +                     else
> > +                             img_bank_info->accepted = 0;
> > +
> > +                     ret = fwu_update_mdata(dev, &mdata);
> > +                     goto out;
>
> ditto

Same as above. Thanks.

-sughosh

>
> > +             }
> > +     }
> > +
> > +     /* Image not found */
> > +     ret = -ENOENT;
> > +
> > +out:
> > +     return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * fwu_accept_image() - Set the Acceptance bit for the image
> > + * @img_type_id: GUID of the image type for which the accepted bit is to be
> > + *               cleared
> > + * @bank: Bank of which the image's Accept bit is to be set
> > + *
> > + * Set the accepted bit for the image specified by the img_guid parameter. This
> > + * indicates acceptance of image for subsequent boots by some governing component
> > + * like OS(or firmware).
> > + *
> > + * Return: 0 if OK, -ve on error
> > + *
> > + */
> > +int fwu_accept_image(efi_guid_t *img_type_id, u32 bank)
> > +{
> > +     return fwu_clrset_image_accept(img_type_id, bank,
> > +                                    IMAGE_ACCEPT_SET);
> > +}
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * fwu_clear_accept_image() - Clear the Acceptance bit for the image
> > + * @img_type_id: GUID of the image type for which the accepted bit is to be
> > + *               cleared
> > + * @bank: Bank of which the image's Accept bit is to be cleared
> > + *
> > + * Clear the accepted bit for the image type specified by the img_type_id parameter.
> > + * This function is called after the image has been updated. The accepted bit is
> > + * cleared to be set subsequently after passing the image acceptance criteria, by
> > + * either the OS(or firmware)
> > + *
> > + * Return: 0 if OK, -ve on error
> > + *
> > + */
> > +int fwu_clear_accept_image(efi_guid_t *img_type_id, u32 bank)
> > +{
> > +     return fwu_clrset_image_accept(img_type_id, bank,
> > +                                    IMAGE_ACCEPT_CLEAR);
> > +}
> > --
> > 2.34.1
> >
>
> Thanks
> /Ilias


More information about the U-Boot mailing list