[uboot] mtd NAND recognition regression

Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi michael at amarulasolutions.com
Thu Oct 20 18:32:54 CEST 2022


Hi Marcin

On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 6:13 PM Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi
<michael at amarulasolutions.com> wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 5:58 PM Marcin Gołaś <marcingol30 at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > after uboot update from 2022.07 to 2022.10 SAMSUNG NAND is not recognized
> > correctly.
> > I use device with SAMSUNG K9K8G08U0F flash which does not support ONFI and
> > JEDEC.
> > Both uboot versions read 8-byte id_data in the same way: 0xD3ECC65A9551D3EC.
> > However 2022.07 recognized flash correctly as:
> > nand_base: 1024 MiB, SLC, erase size: 128 KiB, page size: 2048, OOB size:
> > 64
> > 1024 MiB
> > The new 2022.10 recognized flash incorrectly:
> > nand_base: 1024 MiB, SLC, erase size: 4096 KiB, page size: 4096, OOB size:
> > 128
> > 1024 MiB
> >
> > This behavior is caused by not setting chip->bits_per_cell value which is
> > in my case equal to zero.
> > To fix the issue we need to set it before we enter to function
> > nand_manufacturer_detect.
> > Following patch do this:
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c
> > b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c
> > index 4b09a11288..143d3cb755 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c
> > @@ -4375,6 +4375,8 @@ struct nand_flash_dev *nand_get_flash_type(struct
> > nand_chip *chip, int *maf_id,
> >
> >         chip->chipsize = (uint64_t)type->chipsize << 20;
> >
> > +       chip->bits_per_cell = nand_get_bits_per_cell(chip->id.data[2]);
> > +
> >         if (!type->pagesize) {
> >                 nand_manufacturer_detect(chip);
> >         } else {
> >
>
> Can you please send a patch for it? I will check this regression

--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c
@@ -4171,10 +4171,13 @@ static void nand_manufacturer_detect(struct
nand_chip *chip)
         * nand_decode_ext_id() otherwise.
         */
        if (chip->manufacturer.desc && chip->manufacturer.desc->ops &&
-           chip->manufacturer.desc->ops->detect)
+           chip->manufacturer.desc->ops->detect) {
+               /* The 3rd id byte holds MLC / multichip data */
+               chip->bits_per_cell = nand_get_bits_per_cell(chip->id.data[2]);
                chip->manufacturer.desc->ops->detect(chip);
-       else
+       } else {
                nand_decode_ext_id(chip);
+       }
 }

Can you test this one?

Michael
>
> Michael
>
> >
> > BR,
> > Marcin
>
>
>
> --
> Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi
> Co-Founder & Chief Executive Officer
> M. +39 347 913 2170
> michael at amarulasolutions.com
> __________________________________
>
> Amarula Solutions BV
> Joop Geesinkweg 125, 1114 AB, Amsterdam, NL
> T. +31 (0)85 111 9172
> info at amarulasolutions.com
> www.amarulasolutions.com



-- 
Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi
Co-Founder & Chief Executive Officer
M. +39 347 913 2170
michael at amarulasolutions.com
__________________________________

Amarula Solutions BV
Joop Geesinkweg 125, 1114 AB, Amsterdam, NL
T. +31 (0)85 111 9172
info at amarulasolutions.com
www.amarulasolutions.com


More information about the U-Boot mailing list