[PATCH] binman: btool: gzip: fix packer name so that binary can be found

[Stefan Herbrechtsmeier]

Hi Quentin,

Am 31.08.2022 um 19:44 schrieb Simon Glass:
> On Wed, 31 Aug 2022 at 09:55, Quentin Schulz <foss+uboot at 0leil.net> wrote:
>>
>> From: Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz at theobroma-systems.com>
>>
>> The binary is looked on the system by the suffix of the packer class.
>> This means binman was looking for btool_gzip on the system and not gzip.

Are you sure? I test it and the name is already gzip because the bintool 
is requested as gzip. The find_bintool_class function only change the 
class name.

>> Therefore, let's pass "gzip" as the name so that it can be found and
>> used.
>>
>> Fixes: 0f369d79925a ("binman: Add gzip bintool")
>> Signed-off-by: Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz at theobroma-systems.com>
>> ---
>>   tools/binman/btool/btool_gzip.py | 2 +-
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org>
> 
> Oops! I wonder how we could test this? One way would be to require
> those tools to be present and write a test that reads the version, I
> suppose.

We already have a test for the compressions:
testCompUtilVersions

Regards
   Stefan