[PATCH] mx8m: csf.sh: Fix the calculation of fit_block_size

[Fabio Estevam]

Hi Stefano and Tom,

On Sun, Aug 14, 2022 at 2:25 PM Marek Vasut <marex at denx.de> wrote:
>
> On 8/13/22 14:03, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> > From: Fabio Estevam <festevam at denx.de>
> >
> > When running the script to sign SPL/U-Boot on a kontron-sl-mx8mm board,
> > the fit_block_size was calculated as 0x1000 instead of 0x1020.
> >
> > Add an extra parenthesis pair to fix it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <festevam at denx.de>
> > ---
> > Hi Stefano,
> >
> > This one applies against u-boot-imx.
> >
> > Since this one has not reached mainline yet, it is OK
> > if you want to squash this change in the original commit.
> >
> >   doc/imx/habv4/csf_examples/mx8m/csf.sh | 2 +-
> >   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/doc/imx/habv4/csf_examples/mx8m/csf.sh b/doc/imx/habv4/csf_examples/mx8m/csf.sh
> > index 6898513be51f..7d267a7218d3 100644
> > --- a/doc/imx/habv4/csf_examples/mx8m/csf.sh
> > +++ b/doc/imx/habv4/csf_examples/mx8m/csf.sh
> > @@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ dd if=csf_spl.bin of=flash.bin bs=1 seek=${spl_dd_offset} conv=notrunc
> >   # fitImage tree
> >   fit_block_base=$(printf "0x%x" $(( $(sed -n "/CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE=/ s at .*=@@p" .config) - $(sed -n "/CONFIG_FIT_EXTERNAL_OFFSET=/ s at .*=@@p" .config) - 0x200 - 0x40)) )
> >   fit_block_offset=$(printf "0x%s" $(fdtget -t x u-boot.dtb /binman/imx-boot/uboot offset))
> > -fit_block_size=$(printf "0x%x" $(( ( $(fdtdump u-boot.itb 2>/dev/null | sed -n "/^...totalsize:/ s at .*\(0x[0-9a-f]\+\).*@\1 at p") + 0x1000 - 0x1 ) & ~(0x1000 - 0x1) + 0x20 )) )
> > +fit_block_size=$(printf "0x%x" $(( ( ($(fdtdump u-boot.itb 2>/dev/null | sed -n "/^...totalsize:/ s at .*\(0x[0-9a-f]\+\).*@\1 at p") + 0x1000 - 0x1 ) & ~(0x1000 - 0x1)) + 0x20 )) )
> >   sed -i "/Blocks = / s at .*@  Blocks = $fit_block_base $fit_block_offset $fit_block_size \"flash.bin\", \\\\@" csf_fit.tmp
>
> Reviewed-by: Marek Vasut <marex at denx.de>

Could you please consider applying this one as a fix to 2022.10?

Thanks