[PATCH v2] arch: arm: mach-k3: Delete tifs node in DT fixup
Neha Malcom Francis
n-francis at ti.com
Wed Apr 26 12:31:44 CEST 2023
Hi Udit,
On 26/04/23 15:35, Kumar, Udit wrote:
> Hi Neha
>
> On 4/26/2023 2:56 PM, Neha Malcom Francis wrote:
>> Hi Udit
>>
>> On 20/04/23 13:41, Udit Kumar wrote:
>>> This patch deletes tifs DT node as part of fixup.
>>>
>>> TISCI API reported msmc_size, does not include
>>> 64KB reserved size for tifs aka MSMC comms memory.
>>>
>>> As part of fixup, original code uses TISCI API
>>> reported msmc_size as size for sram DT node.
>>>
>>> tifs node is similar to l3-cache, which should
>>> hold address above msms_size, and should be deleted
>>> before passing control to OS.
>>>
>>> Documentation
>>> https://software-dl.ti.com/tisci/esd/latest/2_tisci_msgs/general/core.html?highlight=msmc#tisci-msg-query-msmc
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Udit Kumar <u-kumar1 at ti.com>
>>> ---
>>> Changes since v1:
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230419061352.3156023-1-u-kumar1@ti.com/
>>> - moved tifs check above l3 as
>>>
>>> arch/arm/mach-k3/common.c | 1 +
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-k3/common.c b/arch/arm/mach-k3/common.c
>>> index a2adb791f6..33b1f10d58 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-k3/common.c
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-k3/common.c
>>> @@ -351,6 +351,7 @@ int fdt_fixup_msmc_ram(void *blob, char
>>> *parent_path, char *node_name)
>>> subnode, addr, size);
>>> if (addr + size > msmc_size ||
>>> !strncmp(fdt_get_name(blob, subnode, &len), "sysfw", 5) ||
>>> + !strncmp(fdt_get_name(blob, subnode, &len), "tifs", 4) ||
>>> !strncmp(fdt_get_name(blob, subnode, &len), "l3cache",
>>> 7)) {
>>> fdt_del_node(blob, subnode);
>>> debug("%s: deleting subnode %d\n", __func__, subnode);
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Neha Malcom Francis <n-francis at ti.com>
>>
>> I do have a general doubt; why do we have only atf-sram sub-node in
>> msmc_sram in all other devices (j721e, j7200 and am65) except j721s2?
>
> let me know, which source code you are referring to
>
In U-Boot, for j721e, j7200 and am65; they *only* contain atf-sram?
> I could see for j721s2 as well, in uboot[0] and Linux[1]
>
> [0]
>
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j721s2-main.dtsi#L16
>
> [1]
>
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j721s2-main.dtsi#L16
>
>
--
Thanking You
Neha Malcom Francis
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list