[PATCH 17/31] sandbox: Allow weak symbols to be dropped
Pali Rohár
pali at kernel.org
Sun Apr 30 11:43:05 CEST 2023
On Saturday 29 April 2023 12:41:31 Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Pali,
>
> On Tue, 25 Apr 2023 at 10:31, Pali Rohár <pali at kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Tuesday 25 April 2023 10:44:17 Bin Meng wrote:
> > > Hi Simon,
> > >
> > > On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 7:09 AM Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The sandbox build makes use of a small number of weak symbols. Allow these
> > > > to be dropped when building for the PE format, since its support for weak
> > > > symbols is poor.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org>
> > > > ---
> > > >
> > > > cmd/bootefi.c | 3 ++-
> > > > cmd/bootz.c | 3 +++
> > > > common/usb.c | 3 +++
> > > > drivers/core/root.c | 3 +++
> > > > drivers/spi/sandbox_spi.c | 3 +++
> > > > env/env.c | 6 ++++++
> > > > lib/efi_loader/efi_image_loader.c | 3 +++
> > > > lib/efi_loader/efi_runtime.c | 4 ++++
> > > > lib/lmb.c | 4 +++-
> > > > lib/time.c | 3 +++
> > > > 10 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > >
> > > You probably need to use:
> > >
> > > __declspec(selectany)
> > >
> > > to replace __weak in the ELF for the *nix world.
> > >
> > > Note this Microsoft bizarre does not provide the "strong override
> > > weak" effect but I suspect what you only need is to get the build pass
> > > on Windows so it should be okay.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Bin
> >
> > You have selectany and external weaks support in PE format. For the
> > majority of weak function cases, this is enough. Cannot we use them?
>
> Not that I can tell.
>
> Can you provide a patch to linux/compiler_attributes.h which handles this?
I can after all my patches on the list are reviewed and merged.
No, I'm not going to _again_ spend time on another patch and then wait
years after somebody take it.
> Regards,
> Simon
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list