[PATCHv5 07/13] net/lwip: implement ping cmd

Maxim Uvarov maxim.uvarov at linaro.org
Thu Aug 3 17:25:37 CEST 2023


On Thu, 3 Aug 2023 at 15:32, Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas at linaro.org>
wrote:

> On Wed, Aug 02, 2023 at 08:06:52PM +0600, Maxim Uvarov wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Maxim Uvarov <maxim.uvarov at linaro.org>
> > ---
> >  lib/lwip/Makefile              |  1 +
> >  lib/lwip/apps/ping/Makefile    | 11 ++++++++++
> >  lib/lwip/apps/ping/lwip_ping.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  lib/lwip/apps/ping/lwip_ping.h | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  lib/lwip/apps/ping/ping.h      | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  5 files changed, 108 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644 lib/lwip/apps/ping/Makefile
> >  create mode 100644 lib/lwip/apps/ping/lwip_ping.c
> >  create mode 100644 lib/lwip/apps/ping/lwip_ping.h
> >  create mode 100644 lib/lwip/apps/ping/ping.h
> >
> > diff --git a/lib/lwip/Makefile b/lib/lwip/Makefile
> > index ec6b728c8e..87ed99a230 100644
> > --- a/lib/lwip/Makefile
> > +++ b/lib/lwip/Makefile
> > @@ -67,5 +67,6 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_NET) += port/sys-arch.o
> >
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_CMD_DHCP) += apps/dhcp/lwip-dhcp.o
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_CMD_DNS) += apps/dns/lwip-dns.o
> > +obj-$(CONFIG_CMD_PING) += apps/ping/
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_CMD_TFTPBOOT) += apps/tftp/
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_CMD_WGET) += apps/http/
> > diff --git a/lib/lwip/apps/ping/Makefile b/lib/lwip/apps/ping/Makefile
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000000..0d0a811336
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/lib/lwip/apps/ping/Makefile
> > @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
> > +ccflags-y += -I$(srctree)/lib/lwip/port/include
> > +ccflags-y += -I$(srctree)/lib/lwip/lwip-external/src/include
> -I$(srctree)/lib/lwip
> > +ccflags-y += -I$(obj)
> > +
> > +.PHONY: $(obj)/ping.c
> > +$(obj)/ping.o: $(obj)/ping.c
> > +$(obj)/ping.c:
> > +     cp $(srctree)/lib/lwip/lwip-external/contrib/apps/ping/ping.c
> $(obj)/ping.c
> > +
> > +obj-$(CONFIG_CMD_PING) += ping.o
> > +obj-$(CONFIG_CMD_PING) += lwip_ping.o
> > diff --git a/lib/lwip/apps/ping/lwip_ping.c
> b/lib/lwip/apps/ping/lwip_ping.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000000..40658ab6fd
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/lib/lwip/apps/ping/lwip_ping.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * (C) Copyright 2023 Linaro Ltd. <maxim.uvarov at linaro.org>
> > + */
> > +
> > +#include "lwip/opt.h"
> > +#include "lwip/ip_addr.h"
> > +#include "ping.h"
> > +
> > +#include <ulwip.h>
> > +
> > +static ip_addr_t ip_target;
> > +
> > +static int ulwip_ping_tmo(void)
> > +{
> > +
> > +     printf("ping failed; host %s is not alive\n",
> ipaddr_ntoa(&ip_target));
> > +     return 0;
>
> Shouldnt this return != 0?


Yes.


> Also why do we need this? Looking at
> ping_raw_init() it ets timeout and print fail messages
>
> No, it doesn't print error messages.  And I wanted to print exactly the
same message as the original ping does to pass validation tests.
=> lwip ping 1.1.1.1
Using virtio-net#30 device
pinging addr: 1.1.1.1
ping failed; host 1.1.1.1 is not alive
=>


> > +}
> > +
> > +int lwip_ping_init(char *ping_addr)
> > +{
> > +     int err;
> > +
> > +     err = ipaddr_aton(ping_addr, &ip_target);
> > +     if (err == 0) {
> > +             printf("wrong ping addr string \"%s\" \n", ping_addr);
> > +             return -1;
> > +     }
> > +
> > +     ulwip_set_tmo(ulwip_ping_tmo);
> > +
> > +     ping_init(&ip_target);
> > +
> > +     return 0;
> > +}
> > diff --git a/lib/lwip/apps/ping/lwip_ping.h
> b/lib/lwip/apps/ping/lwip_ping.h
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000000..7f08095427
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/lib/lwip/apps/ping/lwip_ping.h
> > @@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
> > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+ */
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * (C) Copyright 2023 Linaro Ltd. <maxim.uvarov at linaro.org>
> > + */
> > +
> > +#ifndef LWIP_PING_H
> > +#define LWIP_PING_H
> > +
> > +#include <lwip/ip_addr.h>
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * PING_USE_SOCKETS: Set to 1 to use sockets, otherwise the raw api is
> used
> > + */
>
> Is there any support for sockets in the current series? IOW if someome sets
> this to 1 will it work?  If not get rid of it completely
>
>
Thanks, get rid of it completely. Btw sockets can be implemented, maybe we
will enable them later.


> > +#ifndef PING_USE_SOCKETS
> > +#define PING_USE_SOCKETS   0
> > +#endif
> > +
> > +int lwip_ping_init(char *ping_addr);
> > +
> > +void ping_raw_init(void);
> > +void ping_send_now(void);
> > +
> > +#endif /* LWIP_PING_H */
> > diff --git a/lib/lwip/apps/ping/ping.h b/lib/lwip/apps/ping/ping.h
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000000..0dd4bd78c7
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/lib/lwip/apps/ping/ping.h
> > @@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
> > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> > +
> > +#include "../../../lwip/ulwip.h"
>
> Again, find a away to include this normally, without all the ../../
> uglyness
>
>
yea, fixed everywhere now.


> > +
> > +#include "lwip/prot/ip4.h"
> > +
> > +#define ip4_print_parts(a, b, c, d) \
> > +     printf("%" U16_F ".%" U16_F ".%" U16_F ".%" U16_F, a, b, c, d);
> > +
> > +#define ip4_print(ipaddr) \
> > +     ip4_print_parts(\
> > +                     (u16_t)((ipaddr) != NULL ? ip4_addr1_16(ipaddr) :
> 0), \
> > +                     (u16_t)((ipaddr) != NULL ? ip4_addr2_16(ipaddr) :
> 0), \
> > +                     (u16_t)((ipaddr) != NULL ? ip4_addr3_16(ipaddr) :
> 0), \
> > +                     (u16_t)((ipaddr) != NULL ? ip4_addr4_16(ipaddr) :
> 0))
> > +
> > +
> > +#define LWIP_DEBUG 1 /* ping_time is under ifdef*/
> > +#define PING_RESULT(cond) { \
> > +     if (cond == 1) { \
> > +             printf("host "); \
> > +             ip4_print(addr); \
> > +             printf(" is alive\n"); \
> > +             printf(" %"U32_F" ms\n", (sys_now() - ping_time)); \
> > +             ulwip_exit(0); \
> > +     } else { \
> > +             printf("ping failed; host "); \
> > +             ip4_print(addr); \
> > +             printf(" is not alive\n"); \
> > +             ulwip_exit(-1); \
> > +     } \
> > +     } while (0);
> > +
> > +#include "lwip/ip_addr.h"
> > +void ping_init(const ip_addr_t *ping_addr);
> > --
> > 2.30.2
> >
>
>
> Thanks
> /Ilias
>


More information about the U-Boot mailing list