[PATCH 00/22] x86: Move some boards to text environment

[Tom Rini]

On Mon, Aug 07, 2023 at 04:03:45PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 07, 2023 at 02:44:31PM +0200, Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi wrote:
> > Hi Pali
> > 
> > Can you just filter emails on your side?
> 
> Independently on the question is default setup is good or not
> (from _this_ point of view, I *disagree* with Pali), we have to
> have a possibility to filter on _our_ side the email addresses
> to make people happy. If Pali by some reasons does not want to
> see, it must be easy to keep some deny list in the repository.
> 
> What you are suggesting is not polite I believe.

I have to admit I didn't notice ".get_maintainer.ignore" until now.  So
yes, it sounds like we can do that too.

> 
> > On Mon, Aug 7, 2023 at 2:18 PM Pali Rohár <pali at kernel.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > So remove me from that list of dram.c file. I'm not interested to
> > > receive emails from people who are ignoring me about unrelated things.
> > >
> > > On Monday 07 August 2023 09:43:01 Bin Meng wrote:
> > > > Hi Pali,
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, Aug 6, 2023 at 11:55 PM Pali Rohár <pali at kernel.org> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sunday 06 August 2023 08:39:43 Simon Glass wrote:
> > > > > > Hi Pali,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Sun, 6 Aug 2023 at 04:51, Pali Rohár <pali at kernel.org> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I'm not x86 maintainer, and I'm not going to review changes. So please
> > > > > > > do not send me these emails. I have expressed it many times.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > You were sent one patch (and the cover letter) because you are the
> > > > > > second committer on arch/x86/cpu/qemu/dram.c
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm not maintainer of arch/x86/cpu/qemu/dram.c. How many times I have to
> > > > > repeat it? You do not understand? Or what you are trying to do now?
> > > >
> > > > I believe this cc list comes from patman which calls get_maintainer.pl
> > > > to get the cc list.
> > > > get_maintainer.pl determines the person names from 1. MAINTAINERS of
> > > > the changed file 2. git commit history of the changed file.
> > > >
> > > > I can see the philosophy was that someone who touched the changed file
> > > > should be copied for review.
> > > > We certainly could argue that and just get the list solely from the
> > > > MAINTAINERS file.
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Bin
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi
> > Co-Founder & Chief Executive Officer
> > M. +39 347 913 2170
> > michael at amarulasolutions.com
> > __________________________________
> > 
> > Amarula Solutions BV
> > Joop Geesinkweg 125, 1114 AB, Amsterdam, NL
> > T. +31 (0)85 111 9172
> > info at amarulasolutions.com
> > www.amarulasolutions.com
> 
> -- 
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko
> 
> 

-- 
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 659 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20230807/b509ba05/attachment.sig>