[PATCH 1/6] ufs: Add UFSHCD_QUIRK_BROKEN_64BIT_ADDRESS
Bhupesh Sharma
bhupesh.sharma at linaro.org
Wed Aug 16 00:05:14 CEST 2023
On Wed, 16 Aug 2023 at 03:10, Marek Vasut <marek.vasut at mailbox.org> wrote:
>
> On 8/15/23 23:08, Bhupesh Sharma wrote:
> > On Wed, 16 Aug 2023 at 02:31, Marek Vasut <marek.vasut at mailbox.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 8/15/23 22:04, Bhupesh Sharma wrote:
> >>> Hi Marek,
> >>>
> >>> On 8/14/23 5:22 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> >>>> Add UFSHCD_QUIRK_BROKEN_64BIT_ADDRESS for host controllers which do not
> >>>> support 64-bit addressing.
> >>>>
> >>>> Ported from Linux kernel commit
> >>>> 6554400d6f66 ("scsi: ufs: core: Add UFSHCD_QUIRK_BROKEN_64BIT_ADDRESS")
> >>>> with ufs_scsi_buffer_aligned() based on U-Boot generic bounce buffer.
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas at mailbox.org>
> >>>> ---
> >>>> Cc: Faiz Abbas <faiz_abbas at ti.com>
> >>>> ---
> >>>> drivers/ufs/ufs.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>>> drivers/ufs/ufs.h | 6 ++++++
> >>>> 2 files changed, 32 insertions(+)
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/ufs/ufs.c b/drivers/ufs/ufs.c
> >>>> index 3bf1a95e7f2..da0550d98c6 100644
> >>>> --- a/drivers/ufs/ufs.c
> >>>> +++ b/drivers/ufs/ufs.c
> >>>> @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
> >>>> * Copyright (C) 2019 Texas Instruments Incorporated -
> >>>> http://www.ti.com
> >>>> */
> >>>> +#include <bouncebuf.h>
> >>>> #include <charset.h>
> >>>> #include <common.h>
> >>>> #include <dm.h>
> >>>> @@ -1889,6 +1890,8 @@ int ufshcd_probe(struct udevice *ufs_dev, struct
> >>>> ufs_hba_ops *hba_ops)
> >>>> /* Read capabilties registers */
> >>>> hba->capabilities = ufshcd_readl(hba, REG_CONTROLLER_CAPABILITIES);
> >>>> + if (hba->quirks & UFSHCD_QUIRK_BROKEN_64BIT_ADDRESS)
> >>>> + hba->capabilities &= ~MASK_64_ADDRESSING_SUPPORT;
> >>>> /* Get UFS version supported by the controller */
> >>>> hba->version = ufshcd_get_ufs_version(hba);
> >>>> @@ -1942,8 +1945,31 @@ int ufs_scsi_bind(struct udevice *ufs_dev,
> >>>> struct udevice **scsi_devp)
> >>>> return ret;
> >>>> }
> >>>> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BOUNCE_BUFFER)
> >>>> +static int ufs_scsi_buffer_aligned(struct udevice *scsi_dev, struct
> >>>> bounce_buffer *state)
> >>>> +{
> >>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_PHYS_64BIT
> >>>> + struct ufs_hba *hba = dev_get_uclass_priv(scsi_dev->parent);
> >>>> + uintptr_t ubuf = (uintptr_t)state->user_buffer;
> >>>> + size_t len = state->len_aligned;
> >>>> +
> >>>> + /* Check if below 32bit boundary */
> >>>> + if ((hba->quirks & UFSHCD_QUIRK_BROKEN_64BIT_ADDRESS) &&
> >>>> + ((ubuf >> 32) || (ubuf + len) >> 32)) {
> >>>> + dev_dbg(scsi_dev, "Buffer above 32bit boundary %lx-%lx\n",
> >>>> + ubuf, ubuf + len);
> >>>> + return 0;
> >>>> + }
> >>>> +#endif
> >>>> + return 1;
> >>>> +}
> >>>> +#endif /* CONFIG_BOUNCE_BUFFER */
> >>>> +
> >>>> static struct scsi_ops ufs_ops = {
> >>>> .exec = ufs_scsi_exec,
> >>>> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BOUNCE_BUFFER)
> >>>> + .buffer_aligned = ufs_scsi_buffer_aligned,
> >>>> +#endif /* CONFIG_BOUNCE_BUFFER */
> >>>> };
> >>>> int ufs_probe_dev(int index)
> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/ufs/ufs.h b/drivers/ufs/ufs.h
> >>>> index 8a38832b05f..070db0dce68 100644
> >>>> --- a/drivers/ufs/ufs.h
> >>>> +++ b/drivers/ufs/ufs.h
> >>>> @@ -719,6 +719,12 @@ struct ufs_hba {
> >>>> */
> >>>> #define UFSHCD_QUIRK_BROKEN_LCC 0x1
> >>>> +/*
> >>>> + * This quirk needs to be enabled if the host controller has
> >>>> + * 64-bit addressing supported capability but it doesn't work.
> >>>> + */
> >>>> +#define UFSHCD_QUIRK_BROKEN_64BIT_ADDRESS 0x2
> >>>> +
> >>>> /* Virtual memory reference */
> >>>> struct utp_transfer_cmd_desc *ucdl;
> >>>> struct utp_transfer_req_desc *utrdl;
> >>>
> >>> For this and the follow-up patch, I think implementing or at least
> >>> supporting all the quirks currently supported by the Linux UFS driver
> >>> makes sense as newer controllers do support these quirks.
> >>
> >> I disagree. There is no point in implementing quirks which cannot be
> >> tested or may not even be relevant to U-Boot. Quirks which are needed
> >> should be added one by one.
>
> I assume you agree we should not add all quirks at once ?
>
> > But the format you use for adding new quiks in u-boot is still in sync
> > with Linux version 3.10. Can we atleast use the newer ( 1<< 7) kind of
> > format for consistency.
>
> Feel free to update quirks to BIT() macro.
>
> We should enumerate the quirks in order instead of starting with BIT(7)
> however.
Qualcomm UFS controllers support a few quirks from the list so the
numbering can be taken care of in my patch.
But since 'include/ufs/ufs_quirks.h' in Linux already uses the (1 <<7)
kind of format we can use the same as it would make future backporting
from Linux easier.
Thanks.
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list