[PATCH] test: dm: test-fdt: Use fdtdec_get_int() in dm_check_devices()

[Marek Vasut]

The current fdtdec_get_addr() takes into consideration #address-cells
and #size-cells for "ping-expect" property which is clearly neither.
Use fdtdec_get_int() instead and return negative one in case the
property is not in DT or the platform under test is not DT based,
i.e. mimic the current fdtdec_get_addr() behavior.

This fixes ut dm dm_test_bus_children test.

Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas at mailbox.org>
---
Cc: Mario Six <mario.six at gdsys.cc>
Cc: Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org>
---
 test/dm/test-fdt.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/test/dm/test-fdt.c b/test/dm/test-fdt.c
index eeecd1dc2de..72d0eb57e21 100644
--- a/test/dm/test-fdt.c
+++ b/test/dm/test-fdt.c
@@ -135,8 +135,8 @@ int dm_check_devices(struct unit_test_state *uts, int num_devices)
 		 * want to test the code that sets that up
 		 * (testfdt_drv_probe()).
 		 */
-		base = fdtdec_get_addr(gd->fdt_blob, dev_of_offset(dev),
-				       "ping-expect");
+		base = fdtdec_get_int(gd->fdt_blob, dev_of_offset(dev),
+				      "ping-expect", -1);
 		debug("dev=%d, base=%d: %s\n", i, base,
 		      fdt_get_name(gd->fdt_blob, dev_of_offset(dev), NULL));
 
-- 
2.40.1