[PATCH] fpga: define dummy fpga_load function for debug build

[Chanho Park]

Hi,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eugen Hristev <eugen.hristev at collabora.com>
> Sent: Monday, August 28, 2023 5:47 PM
> To: Chanho Park <chanho61.park at samsung.com>; 'Michal Simek'
> <michal.simek at amd.com>; u-boot at lists.denx.de
> Cc: Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] fpga: define dummy fpga_load function for debug build
> 
> On 8/28/23 03:21, Chanho Park wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Michal Simek <michal.simek at amd.com>
> >> Sent: Friday, August 25, 2023 4:23 PM
> >> To: Chanho Park <chanho61.park at samsung.com>; u-boot at lists.denx.de
> >> Subject: Re: [PATCH] fpga: define dummy fpga_load function for debug
> >> build
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On 8/16/23 08:54, Chanho Park wrote:
> >>> This fixes below build error when CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_DEBUG is enabled
> >>> and CONFIG_SPL_FPGA is not enabled.
> >>>
> >>> ../common/spl/spl_fit.c:591: undefined reference to `fpga_load'
> >>> collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Chanho Park <chanho61.park at samsung.com>
> >>> ---
> >>>    include/fpga.h | 8 ++++++++
> >>>    1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/include/fpga.h b/include/fpga.h index
> >>> ed688cc0fa3b..44f2755a3f10 100644
> >>> --- a/include/fpga.h
> >>> +++ b/include/fpga.h
> >>> @@ -60,8 +60,16 @@ int fpga_add(fpga_type devtype, void *desc);
> >>>    int fpga_count(void);
> >>>    const fpga_desc *const fpga_get_desc(int devnum);
> >>>    int fpga_is_partial_data(int devnum, size_t img_len);
> >>> +#if CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(FPGA)
> >>>    int fpga_load(int devnum, const void *buf, size_t bsize,
> >>>    	      bitstream_type bstype, int flags);
> >>> +#else
> >>> +static inline int fpga_load(int devnum, const void *buf, size_t bsize,
> >>> +	      bitstream_type bstype, int flags) {
> >>> +	return FPGA_FAIL;
> >>> +}
> >>> +#endif
> >>>    int fpga_fsload(int devnum, const void *buf, size_t size,
> >>>    		fpga_fs_info *fpga_fsinfo);
> >>>    int fpga_loads(int devnum, const void *buf, size_t size,
> >>
> >> There is another patch targeting the same code.
> >> Please take a look at
> >> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230808102227.34233-1-
> >> eugen.hristev at collabora.com
> >
> > I wasn't aware that there was an attempt to fix the issue. If I knew it,
> I would reply the patch...
> >
> >>
> >> and work together to come up with the patch which covers both cases.
> >
> > Yes. I also tried to make the patch with CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_DEBUG
> guard but I couldn't find any codes that uses the guard.
> > And I was also worried about the CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_DEBUG's behavior. It
> could be related with the optimization level of the compiler.
> > That's why I put the guard with #if CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(FPGA).
> >
> > Best Regards,
> > Chanho Park
> >
> 
> 
> Hi Chanho,
> 
> Simon suggested to use CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_DEBUG in this case here:
> 
> https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=a911b2cb-c86a1843-a9103984-
> 74fe4860018a-146c33e2b586dc8a&q=1&e=e288ab48-75e8-400b-91c9-
> e8bd95520918&u=https%3A%2F%2Fpatchwork.ozlabs.org%2Fproject%2Fuboot%2Fpatc
> h%2F20230619102839.277902-1-eugen.hristev%40collabora.com%2F
> 
> As I told Michal, basically your patch and my patch do the same thing.
> I suggested him to pick the one that he thinks it's best. (or even suggest
> another way)

I agree. Either way, I'm fine with it.

Best Regards,
Chanho Park