[PATCH] mach-imx: bootaux: fix building with disabled bootelf

Oleksandr Suvorov oleksandr.suvorov at foundries.io
Thu Aug 31 15:56:45 CEST 2023


Hi Tom,

On Sun, Aug 27, 2023 at 2:50 AM Tom Rini <trini at konsulko.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Aug 26, 2023 at 06:16:36PM +0300, Oleksandr Suvorov wrote:
> > Hi Heinrich,
> >
> > On Sat, Aug 26, 2023 at 4:46 PM Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk at gmx.de> wrote:
> > >
> > > On 8/26/23 15:24, Oleksandr Suvorov wrote:
> > > > If CMD_ELF disabled and IMX_BOOTAUX enabled, the u-boot building ends
> > > > up with a linking error [1]. Select LIB_ELF for all cases when
> > > > valid_elf_image() is used in the imx_bootaux module.
> > > >
> > > > [1]
> > > > ld: /tmp/ccaF1rpv.ltrans0.ltrans.o: in function `do_bootaux':
> > > > arch/arm/mach-imx/imx_bootaux.c:108: undefined reference to `valid_elf_image'
> > > >
> > > > Fixes: c0f037f6a2a ("mach-imx: bootaux: elf firmware support")
> > > > Signed-off-by: Oleksandr Suvorov <oleksandr.suvorov at foundries.io>
> > > > ---
> > > >
> > > >   arch/arm/mach-imx/Kconfig | 1 +
> > > >   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-imx/Kconfig
> > > > index d94b5828d0d..cbe62d6b8f9 100644
> > > > --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/Kconfig
> > > > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/Kconfig
> > > > @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ config IMX_RDC
> > > >   config IMX_BOOTAUX
> > > >       bool "Support boot auxiliary core"
> > > >       depends on ARCH_MX7 || ARCH_MX6 || ARCH_VF610 || ARCH_IMX8 || ARCH_IMX8M
> > > > +     select LIB_ELF if !ARCH_IMX8 || IMX8QXP
> > >
> > > For CONFIG_IMX8QXP=y arch/arm/mach-imx/imx8/cpu.c uses valid_elf_image().
> > >
> > > Shouldn't the IMX8QXP case be handled in arch/arm/mach-imx/imx8/Kconfig?
> > >
> > > config IMX8QXP
> > >         select LIB_ELF
> >
> > We need to select LIB_ELF for this SoC only if IMX_BOOTAUX is enabled:
> > the arch/arm/mach-imx/imx8/cpu.c guards with #ifdef CONFIG_IMX_BOOTAUX
> > functions that
> > call lib/elf.o members.
>
> And what about the rest of the platforms above?  There's certainly some
> missing Kconfig enforcement of requirements, but I suspect it's wider
> than just one set of SoC families for a long-standing feature.

You may be right. As bootaux command implementation for other boards
may use elf functionality in future, it
would be better to enable LIB_ELF unconditionally.

>
> --
> Tom



-- 
Best regards,

Oleksandr Suvorov
Software Engineer
T: +380 63 8489656
E: oleksandr.suvorov at foundries.io
W: www.foundries.io


More information about the U-Boot mailing list