[PATCH 2/2 v3] smbios: Fallback to the default DT if sysinfo nodes are missing

Tom Rini trini at konsulko.com
Sun Dec 17 19:41:00 CET 2023


On Sat, Dec 16, 2023 at 11:46:18AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Tom,
> 
> On Thu, 14 Dec 2023 at 06:11, Tom Rini <trini at konsulko.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 08:19:11PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> >
> > [snip]
> > > The new DT nodes / SMBIOS binding [1] allows for the correct
> > > information to be provided, though.
> > [snip]
> > > [1] https://github.com/u-boot/u-boot/blob/master/doc/device-tree-bindings/sysinfo/smbios.txt
> >
> > I think the only feedback I can give on your message here is to please
> > go upstream that binding, and then we can see what to do afterwards.
> 
> I am still tearing my hair out waiting for the reserved-memory and
> binman patches to be accepted. Every few weeks there is another
> comment, but no action. Rob seems to be the only one engaged.
> 
> Perhaps I should do a conference talk about what is wrong with DT?

Perhaps.

> This is my experience so far:
> 
> - there is no urgency to apply anything
> - no one wins acclaim for applying a patch
> - everyone complains later if a patch is applied that they didn't agree with
> - people chime in wanting to understand the use case, but don't/can't/won't
> - any sort of expressed doubt results in delay
> - maintainers hope that the submitter will lose interest and go away
> - not enough people add review tags, even if they look at it
>    ... because they are worried about looking bad to others on the ML
> 
> I would be happy to discuss how to improve matters, but that is what I see.
> 
> Anyway, the lowest-hanging fruit at present is the U-Boot /options
> stuff. I was hoping someone else would step up to clean it up. There
> should be no impediment.

And my point with the above is that other SoC maintainers (Neil, for
amlogic) have said (paraphrasing) he does not want to do N smbios node
patches. Which is why Ilias' patch is if not 1000% correct, it's Good
Enough and will, if it's really a problem to have all lower case
information displayed, spur people to see providing that information as
a real problem that needs to be solved. Or it will be seen as good
enough.

-- 
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 659 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20231217/050d1515/attachment.sig>


More information about the U-Boot mailing list