[PATCH v2 078/169] Correct SPL use of EFI_UNICODE_COLLATION_PROTOCOL2

[Heinrich Schuchardt]

On 2/5/23 23:39, Simon Glass wrote:
> This converts 1 usage of this option to the non-SPL form, since there is
> no SPL_EFI_UNICODE_COLLATION_PROTOCOL2 defined in Kconfig
> 
> Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org>
> ---
> 
> (no changes since v1)
> 
>   lib/efi_loader/efi_root_node.c | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/efi_loader/efi_root_node.c b/lib/efi_loader/efi_root_node.c
> index 21a014d7c21..108c14b95bd 100644
> --- a/lib/efi_loader/efi_root_node.c
> +++ b/lib/efi_loader/efi_root_node.c
> @@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ efi_status_t efi_root_node_register(void)
>   		 &efi_guid_dt_fixup_protocol,
>   		 &efi_dt_fixup_prot,
>   #endif
> -#if CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(EFI_UNICODE_COLLATION_PROTOCOL2)
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_EFI_UNICODE_COLLATION_PROTOCOL2)

I never received this patch in my inbox. Expect series with more than 50 
mails not even to be copied to the spam folder. They are outright 
rejected by my mail provider.

I cannot see any problem solved by this patch. Why did you send it?

Best regards

Heinrich

>   		 &efi_guid_unicode_collation_protocol2,
>   		 &efi_unicode_collation_protocol2,
>   #endif