[PATCH v2 075/169] Correct SPL use of EFI_MM_COMM_TEE

Heinrich Schuchardt heinrich.schuchardt at canonical.com
Tue Feb 7 00:57:34 CET 2023


On 2/6/23 01:54, Simon Glass wrote:
> This converts 1 usage of this option to the non-SPL form, since there is
> no SPL_EFI_MM_COMM_TEE defined in Kconfig
> 
> Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org>
> ---
> 
> (no changes since v1)
> 
>   cmd/eficonfig.c | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/cmd/eficonfig.c b/cmd/eficonfig.c
> index 47c04cf5363..46f652c35d6 100644
> --- a/cmd/eficonfig.c
> +++ b/cmd/eficonfig.c
> @@ -2670,7 +2670,7 @@ static const struct eficonfig_item maintenance_menu_items[] = {
>   	{"Edit Boot Option", eficonfig_process_edit_boot_option},
>   	{"Change Boot Order", eficonfig_process_change_boot_order},
>   	{"Delete Boot Option", eficonfig_process_delete_boot_option},
> -#if (CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(EFI_SECURE_BOOT) && CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(EFI_MM_COMM_TEE))
> +#if (CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(EFI_SECURE_BOOT) && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_EFI_MM_COMM_TEE))

There is no reason to use two different macros here.

Best regards

Heinrich

>   	{"Secure Boot Configuration", eficonfig_process_secure_boot_config},
>   #endif
>   	{"Quit", eficonfig_process_quit},


More information about the U-Boot mailing list