[PATCH v2 077/169] Correct SPL use of EFI_TCG2_PROTOCOL

[Heinrich Schuchardt]

On 2/7/23 05:02, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Heinrich,
> 
> On Mon, 6 Feb 2023 at 16:41, Heinrich Schuchardt
> <heinrich.schuchardt at canonical.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 2/5/23 23:39, Simon Glass wrote:
>>> This converts 1 usage of this option to the non-SPL form, since there is
>>> no SPL_EFI_TCG2_PROTOCOL defined in Kconfig
>>
>> Why do you touch the code? I can't see any problem being solved.
> 
> CONFIG_IS_ENABLED() is going away, so we need to migrate things that
> should not be using it. I understand that EFI is not used in SPL, so
> it is also redundant.
> 

Neither the cover letter of this series nor the commit message of this 
patch says that CONFIG_IS_ENABLED() is going away.

Both the cover letter and the commit message of the individual patches 
should clearly indicate this intention.

Why do you want to eliminate CONFIG_IS_ENABLED()? What is going to 
replace it?

Best regards

Heinrich