[PATCH v2 068/169] Correct SPL use of DM_RNG

[Simon Glass]

Hi Tom,

On Wed, 8 Feb 2023 at 17:40, Tom Rini <trini at konsulko.com> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Feb 05, 2023 at 03:39:37PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
>
> > This converts 1 usage of this option to the non-SPL form, since there is
> > no SPL_DM_RNG defined in Kconfig
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org>
> > ---
> >
> > (no changes since v1)
> >
> >  boot/vbe_request.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/boot/vbe_request.c b/boot/vbe_request.c
> > index 45f1d2b7e17..312edfa2bdb 100644
> > --- a/boot/vbe_request.c
> > +++ b/boot/vbe_request.c
> > @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ static int handle_random_req(ofnode node, int default_size,
> >       u32 size;
> >       int ret;
> >
> > -     if (!CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(DM_RNG))
> > +     if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DM_RNG))
> >               return -ENOTSUPP;
> >
> >       if (ofnode_read_u32(node, "vbe,size", &size)) {
>
> This breaks sandbox_vpl.

Yes I think I mentioned that this needs dropping for ordering reasons.
I've moved it into splc.

Regards,
Simon