[PATCH v2 031/169] Correct SPL use of ATMEL_PIO4

[Tom Rini]

On Sun, Feb 05, 2023 at 03:36:17PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:

> This converts 1 usage of this option to the non-SPL form, since there is
> no SPL_ATMEL_PIO4 defined in Kconfig
> 
> Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org>
> ---
> 
> (no changes since v1)
> 
>  drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91-pio4.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91-pio4.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91-pio4.c
> index 50e3dd449ab..84b398619c4 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91-pio4.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91-pio4.c
> @@ -271,7 +271,7 @@ static int atmel_pinctrl_bind(struct udevice *dev)
>  	ofnode node = dev_ofnode(dev);
>  	struct atmel_pinctrl_data *priv = (struct atmel_pinctrl_data *)dev_get_driver_data(dev);
>  
> -	if (!CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(ATMEL_PIO4))
> +	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ATMEL_PIO4))
>  		return 0;
>  
>  	/* Obtain a handle to the GPIO driver */

This grows SPL in a number of platforms, so adding in Eugen to see if we
really do want to omit this here in SPL on platforms that otherwise set
the symbol.

-- 
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 659 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20230209/a67f0161/attachment.sig>