[PATCH 2/2] tpm: Implement tpm_auto_start() for TPMv1.2

Simon Glass sjg at chromium.org
Tue Feb 21 14:17:24 CET 2023


Hi Ilias,

On Tue, 21 Feb 2023 at 06:10, Ilias Apalodimas
<ilias.apalodimas at linaro.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Simon,
>
> Unfortunately, this doesn't apply cleanly over
> https://lore.kernel.org/u-boot/20230218152741.528191-1-ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org/
>
> I'll have a look at the conflicts, if they are minor i'll fix them up.
> Otherwise you'll have to respin this

That's strange. I just tried again with going to the patch [1] and
downloading the series. I am using -next though...could that be why?

Regards,
Simon

[1] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/patch/20230218152741.528191-4-ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org/

>
> Thanks
> /Ilias
>
> On Tue, 21 Feb 2023 at 15:08, Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Ilias,
> >
> > On Tue, 21 Feb 2023 at 06:03, Ilias Apalodimas
> > <ilias.apalodimas at linaro.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Simon,
> > >
> > > On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 02:27:36PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> > > > Add an implementation of this, moving the common call to tpm_init() up
> > > > into the common API implementation.
> > > >
> > > > Add a test.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org>
> > > > ---
> > > >
> > > >  include/tpm-common.h |  2 +-
> > > >  include/tpm-v1.h     | 11 +++++++++++
> > > >  lib/tpm-v1.c         | 16 ++++++++++++++++
> > > >  lib/tpm-v2.c         |  8 --------
> > > >  lib/tpm_api.c        | 19 ++++++++++++++++---
> > > >  test/dm/tpm.c        | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > >  6 files changed, 89 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/include/tpm-common.h b/include/tpm-common.h
> > > > index b2c5404430f..1ba81386ce1 100644
> > > > --- a/include/tpm-common.h
> > > > +++ b/include/tpm-common.h
> > > > @@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ struct tpm_ops {
> > > >        * close().
> > > >        *
> > > >        * @dev:        Device to open
> > > > -      * @return 0 ok OK, -ve on error
> > > > +      * @return 0 ok OK, -EBUSY if already opened, other -ve on other error
> > > >        */
> > > >       int (*open)(struct udevice *dev);
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/include/tpm-v1.h b/include/tpm-v1.h
> > > > index 33d53fb695e..60b71e2a4b6 100644
> > > > --- a/include/tpm-v1.h
> > > > +++ b/include/tpm-v1.h
> > > > @@ -591,4 +591,15 @@ u32 tpm_set_global_lock(struct udevice *dev);
> > > >   */
> > > >  u32 tpm1_resume(struct udevice *dev);
> > > >
> > > > +/**
> > > > + * tpm1_auto_start() - start up the TPM
> > > > + *
> > > > + * This does not do a self test.
> > > > + *
> > > > + * @dev              TPM device
> > > > + * Return: TPM2_RC_SUCCESS, on success, or when the TPM returns
> > > > + * TPM_INVALID_POSTINIT; TPM_FAILEDSELFTEST, if the TPM is in failure state
> > > > + */
> > > > +u32 tpm1_auto_start(struct udevice *dev);
> > > > +
> > > >  #endif /* __TPM_V1_H */
> > > > diff --git a/lib/tpm-v1.c b/lib/tpm-v1.c
> > > > index d0e3ab1b21d..ea3833549bc 100644
> > > > --- a/lib/tpm-v1.c
> > > > +++ b/lib/tpm-v1.c
> > > > @@ -69,6 +69,22 @@ u32 tpm1_continue_self_test(struct udevice *dev)
> > > >       return tpm_sendrecv_command(dev, command, NULL, NULL);
> > > >  }
> > > >
> > > > +u32 tpm1_auto_start(struct udevice *dev)
> > > > +{
> > > > +     u32 rc;
> > > > +
> > > > +     rc = tpm1_startup(dev, TPM_ST_CLEAR);
> > > > +     /* continue on if the TPM is already inited */
> > > > +     if (rc && rc != TPM_INVALID_POSTINIT)
> > > > +             return rc;
> > > > +
> > > > +     rc = tpm1_self_test_full(dev);
> > > > +     if (rc)
> > > > +             return rc;
> > >
> > > Mind if I remove this if before merging?
> >
> > Yes that's fine.
> >
> > >
> > > > +
> > > > +     return rc;
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > >  {
> > >
> > > [...]
> > >
> > > > +
> > > > +     return 0;
> > > > +}
> > > > +DM_TEST(dm_test_tpm_autostart_reinit, UT_TESTF_SCAN_FDT);
> > > > --
> > > > 2.39.2.637.g21b0678d19-goog
> > > >
> > >
> > > Other than that
> > > Reviewed-by: Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas at linaro.org>
> > >
> >
> > Regards,
> > Simon


More information about the U-Boot mailing list