[PATCH v5 0/6] FWU: Handle meta-data in common code

Jassi Brar jaswinder.singh at linaro.org
Tue Feb 28 02:00:10 CET 2023


On Mon, 27 Feb 2023 at 18:58, Tom Rini <trini at konsulko.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 06:51:35PM -0600, jassisinghbrar at gmail.com wrote:
>
> > From: Jassi Brar <jaswinder.singh at linaro.org>
> >
> > The patchset reduces ~400 lines of code, while keeping the functionality same and making
> > meta-data operations much faster (by using cached structures).
> >
> > Issue:
> >  meta-data copies (primary and secondary) are being handled by the backend/storage layer
> > instead of the common core in fwu.c (as also noted by Ilias)  that is, gpt_blk.c manages
> > meta-data and similarly raw_mtd.c will have to do the same when it arrives. The code
> > could by make smaller, cleaner and optimised.
> >
> > Basic idea:
> >  Introduce  .read_mdata() and .write_mdata() in fwu_mdata_ops  that simply read/write
> > meta-data copy. The core code takes care of integrity and redundancy of the meta-data,
> > as a result we can get rid of every other callback .get_mdata() .update_mdata()
> > .get_mdata_part_num()  .read_mdata_partition()  .write_mdata_partition() and the
> > corresponding wrapper functions thereby making the code 100s of LOC smaller.
> >
> > Get rid of fwu_check_mdata_validity() and fwu_mdata_check() which expected underlying
> > layer to manage and verify mdata copies.
> > Implement  fwu_get_verified_mdata(struct fwu_mdata *mdata) public function that reads,
> > verifies and, if needed, fixes the meta-data copies.
> >
> > Verified copy of meta-data is now cached as 'g_mdata' in fwu.c, which avoids multiple
> > low-level expensive read and parse calls.
> > gpt meta-data partition numbers are now cached in gpt_blk.c, so that we don't have to do expensive part_get_info() and uid ops.
> >
> > Changes since v4:
> >         * Change fwu-mdata-mtd bindings to not require external changes
> >         * Handle 'part == BOTH_PARTS' in fwu_sync_mdata
> >         * use parts_ok[] and parts_mdata[] instead of pri/sec_ok and p/s_mdata
>
> Did you run this through CI / build sandbox? This doesn't read like you
> fixed the problem I reported in CI, when I was trying to merge v4.
>
I know that remains to be done.
The dt-bindings for fwu-mdata is changed in this patchset and I
thought any testcase may be impacted by it.

thanks.


More information about the U-Boot mailing list