[PATCH 2/4] usb: ohci-at91: Enable OHCI functionality and register into DM

[Marek Vasut]

On 1/3/23 17:01, Sergiu.Moga at microchip.com wrote:
> On 03.01.2023 17:57, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> On 1/3/23 16:49, Sergiu.Moga at microchip.com wrote:
>>> On 03.01.2023 16:34, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>>> On 1/3/23 13:11, Sergiu.Moga at microchip.com wrote:
>>>>> On 03.01.2023 01:26, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>>>>> On 12/23/22 13:34, Sergiu Moga wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [...]
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/ohci-at91.c
>>>>>>> b/drivers/usb/host/ohci-at91.c
>>>>>>> index 9b955c1bd6..9ae55c6e5d 100644
>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/usb/host/ohci-at91.c
>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/usb/host/ohci-at91.c
>>>>>>> @@ -5,6 +5,9 @@
>>>>>>>       */
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>      #include <common.h>
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> +#if !(CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(DM_USB))
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>      #include <asm/arch/clk.h>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>      int usb_cpu_init(void)
>>>>>>> @@ -62,3 +65,183 @@ int usb_cpu_init_fail(void)
>>>>>>>      {
>>>>>>>          return usb_cpu_stop();
>>>>>>>      }
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Would it be possible to just remove the non-DM functionality ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Unfortunately, the other older boards would not build and work anymore
>>>>> if I were to remove this.
>>>>
>>>> Any chance they can be converted to DM ?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Not at the moment, no.
>>
>> Why ?
> 
> My apologies, but I do not have these boards at my disposal to test them
> and they are not the focus of this patch series. The reason I kept the
> non-DM part is that so the build on the other boards does not break.
> Perhaps in the future there will be plans to convert these as well but
> at the moment I can not say for sure.

No need to apologize. Can you add a comment into the commit message, 
explaining this ?