[PATCH v3 2/2] gpio: Get rid of gpio_hog_probe_all()

[Tom Rini]

On Tue, Jan 03, 2023 at 04:28:13PM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 1/3/23 14:50, Quentin Schulz wrote:
> > Hi Patrice,
> > 
> > On 1/3/23 14:35, Patrice CHOTARD wrote:
> > > 
> > > Hi Tom
> > > 
> > > This patch is landing in the mailing list since a while.
> > > Do you expect to merge it in master or in next branch soon ?
> > > This patch will be useful for STM32MP SoC in order to clean
> > > according machine code.
> > > 
> > 
> > The main issue here is that Simon would like a test case for the first
> > patch in the series and I wasn't able to add tests to the sandbox to
> > guarantee there's no regression in the future, hence why it was kinda
> > parked on the ML without much work on it.
> 
> Hmmm, seems there is little input on how to write the test or even what to
> test, so maybe this should be just merged, esp. if it is useful.

What's missing from
https://u-boot.readthedocs.io/en/latest/develop/tests_writing.html for
this case?

-- 
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 659 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20230109/8d1b8909/attachment.sig>