[PATCH 2/2] event: Correct dependencies on the EVENT framework
Simon Glass
sjg at chromium.org
Sun Jan 15 02:31:05 CET 2023
Hi Tom,
On Sat, 14 Jan 2023 at 13:49, Tom Rini <trini at konsulko.com> wrote:
>
> The event framework is just that, a framework. Enabling it by itself
> does nothing, so we shouldn't ask the user about it. Reword (and correct
> typos) around this the option and help text. This also applies to
> DM_EVENT, so reword as well.
>
> With this, it's time to address the larger problems. When functionality
> uses events, typically via EVENT_SPY, the appropriate framework then
> must be select'd and NOT imply'd. As the functionality will cease to
> work (and so, platforms will fail to boot) this is non-optional and
> where select is appropriate. Audit the current users of EVENT_SPY to
> have a more fine-grained approach to select'ing the framework where
> used.
>
> Cc: Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org>
> Reported-by: Oliver Graute <Oliver.Graute at kococonnector.com>
> Reported-by: Francesco Dolcini <francesco.dolcini at toradex.com>
> Fixes: 7fe32b3442f0 ("event: Convert arch_cpu_init_dm() to use events")
> Fixes: 42fdcebf859f ("event: Convert misc_init_f() to use events")
> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini at konsulko.com>
> ---
> arch/Kconfig | 6 +++---
> arch/arm/Kconfig | 9 ++++-----
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/Kconfig | 3 +++
> arch/mips/Kconfig | 2 +-
> arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/Kconfig | 1 +
> arch/x86/Kconfig | 1 +
> arch/x86/cpu/baytrail/Kconfig | 1 +
> arch/x86/cpu/broadwell/Kconfig | 1 +
> arch/x86/cpu/ivybridge/Kconfig | 1 +
> arch/x86/cpu/quark/Kconfig | 1 +
> board/google/Kconfig | 1 +
> board/keymile/Kconfig | 1 +
> boot/Kconfig | 1 +
> cmd/Kconfig | 1 +
> common/Kconfig | 17 ++++++++---------
> drivers/core/Kconfig | 9 +++++----
> drivers/cpu/Kconfig | 1 -
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org>
Tested on chromebook-coral:
Tested-by: Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org>
I am not quite sure what the effective difference is between select
and imply. Doesn't this suggest that there are some conflicting config
options? The only way imply would be disabled ( I thought) is if a
board does it explicitly?
Regards,
Simon
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list