[PATCH 2/3] pinctrl: get rid of some ifdeffery
Michael Walle
michael at walle.cc
Wed Jan 18 13:43:17 CET 2023
Am 2023-01-18 13:18, schrieb Marek Vasut:
> On 1/18/23 13:12, Michael Walle wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>> @@ -411,12 +405,11 @@ static int __maybe_unused
>> pinctrl_post_bind(struct udevice *dev)
>> }
>> /*
>> - * If set_state callback is set, we assume this pinctrl driver is
>> the
>> - * full implementation. In this case, its child nodes should be
>> bound
>> - * so that peripheral devices can easily search in parent devices
>> - * during later DT-parsing.
>> + * If the pinctrl driver has the full implementation, its child
>> nodes
>> + * should be bound so that peripheral devices can easily search in
>> + * parent devices during later DT-parsing.
>> */
>> - if (ops->set_state)
>> + if (CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(PINCTRL_FULL))
>> return pinconfig_post_bind(dev);
>
> Is it correct to drop the ops->set_state non-NULL check ?
See include/dm/pinctrl.h. set_state() is mandatory. Although,
that seems to be wrong for the simple implementation.
-michael
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list