reset-loop on Odroid U2: cros-ec communications failure
Joost van Zwieten
joost at diskos.nl
Sat Jan 21 22:04:04 CET 2023
On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 15:11, Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org> wrote:
> Hi Joost,
>
> On Fri, 20 Jan 2023 at 15:00, Joost van Zwieten <joost at diskos.nl>
> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 11:00, Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org> wrote:
>> > Hi Joost,
>> >
>> > On Mon, 9 Jan 2023 at 06:31, Joost van Zwieten <joost at diskos.nl>
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Dear maintainers,
>> >>
>> >> U-Boot on my Odroid U2 fails to initialize as of commit
>> >> e44d7e73fe0d649693d8d0a110cd7632bc919273 (introduced after
>> >> v2022.10). I
>> >> get the following output:
>> >>
>> >> U-Boot 2022.10-00565-ge44d7e73fe-dirty (Jan 09 2023 -
>> 01:04:19
>> >> +0100)
>> >>
>> >> CPU: Exynos4412 @ 1 GHz
>> >> Model: Odroid based on Exynos4412
>> >> Type: u3
>> >> DRAM: 2 GiB
>> >> Core: 101 devices, 12 uclasses, devicetree: separate
>> >> LDO20 at VDDQ_EMMC_1.8V: set 1800000 uV; enabling
>> >> LDO22 at VDDQ_EMMC_2.8V: set 2800000 uV; enabling
>> >> LDO21 at TFLASH_2.8V: set 2800000 uV; enabling
>> >> MMC: SAMSUNG SDHCI: 2, EXYNOS DWMMC: 0
>> >> Loading Environment from MMC... *** Warning - bad CRC, using
>> >> default environment
>> >>
>> >> cros-ec communications failure -96
>> >>
>> >> Please reset with Power+Refresh
>> >>
>> >> Cannot init cros-ec device
>> >> resetting ...
>> >>
>> >> This repeats indefinitely. I'm building U-Boot using the default
>> >> config
>> >> for board `odroid` and boot the Odroid from an SD card with
>> firmware
>> >> (`bl1`, `bl2` and `tzsw`) from Hardkernel's clone of the u-boot
>> >> repository [1]. There are no peripherals connected apart from
>> the SD
>> >> card and the serial console. Please let me know if you need more
>> >> information.
>> >
>> > board_late_init() is presumably enabled with
>> CONFIG_BOARD_LATE_INIT
>> > and the code in board/samsung/common/board.c is being called.
>> >
>> > -96 is -EPFNOSUPPORT which means that the CROS_EC uclass is
>> missing.
>> >
>> > So either enable CROS_EC so you have the uclass, or disable
>> > BOARD_LATE_INIT so it doesn't matter.
>> >
>> >>
>> >> Best, Joost
>> >>
>> >> [1]:
>> >>
>> >>
>> https://github.com/hardkernel/u-boot/tree/33e05ffb159141b640571e91470172d83a2a1273/sd_fuse
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> > Simon
>>
>> Hi Simon,
>>
>> Thanks. Both solutions work. With `CROS_EC` enabled
>> `uclass_first_device_err(UCLASS_CROS_EC, &dev)` returns `ENODEV`.
>> Since
>> `board_late_init()` seems to do legitimate work for this board
>> (defining the `mmcbootdev` environment variable) I think enabling
>> `CROS_EC` is the way to go. Should this be part of the defconfig for
>> odroid? If so, I can send a patch.
>
> Yes that seems OK to me.
>
> Regards,
> Simon
I've send a patch.
I'm still a bit puzzled by this problem, though. Is it correct that
`uclass_first_device_err(UCLASS_CROS_EC, ...)` always returns
`-EPFNOSUPPORT` when `CROS_EC` is disabled in the `.config`? If so, I
don't see how U-Boot is going to function properly on any board that
hits `board_late_init()` (board/samsung/common/board.c) with
`BOARD_LATE_INIT=y` and `CROS_EC` undefined and perhaps the best
solution is to run the CROS_EC related statements only if `CROS_EC` is
actually defined. I'm not sure about the implications of this proposal
further down the road, though.
Best, Joost
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list