U-Boot support for M68K removal

[Angelo Dureghello]

Hi Tom and all,

really have to apologize, had hard times these last 2 years
and couldn't follow at all the activity, i am totally culprit
and responsible.

Now i can jump back on following, if there is any sense
in keeping m68k/coldfire.
Let me know, if ok i start back checking all old patches
from tonight. Also, will have to update my email and rebase
to master.

Regards,
angelo

On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 3:44 PM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert at linux-m68k.org>
wrote:

> CC Angelo's other address, as sysam.it is MIA.
>
> On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 2:50 PM Tom Rini <trini at konsulko.com> wrote:
> > Hey all (and especially the non-U-Boot folks / lists),
> >
> > U-Boot has had support for the m68k architecture for practically forever
> > it seems like. Unfortunately, it's also been a few years now since I've
> > seen anyone active in reviewing general patches to the architecture and
> > doing the little things to keep it up to date and following best
> > practices. So I'm here asking, does anyone know someone interested in
> > maintaining U-Boot on m68k, for whatever platforms interest them?
> > Otherwise, sometime this year I'm likely to drop the architecture.
>
> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
>
>                         Geert
>
> --
> Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 --
> geert at linux-m68k.org
>
> In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker.
> But
> when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like
> that.
>                                 -- Linus Torvalds
>


-- 
Angelo Dureghello
*Timesys*
e. angelo.dureghello at timesys.com