[PATCH 016/171] iommu: Add a Kconfig for SPL_PINCTRL_ARMADA_38X

[Tom Rini]

On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 07:16:26PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Monday 30 January 2023 11:29:27 Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 05:19:01PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > > > From: Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org>
> > > > Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2023 07:40:49 -0700
> > > > 
> > > > This is implicitly used in the source and seems useful, so add it.
> > > 
> > > Not sure how this ended up with an "iommu" tag, but that seems wrong.
> > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org>
> > > > ---
> > > > 
> > > >  drivers/pinctrl/mvebu/Kconfig | 4 ++++
> > > >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/mvebu/Kconfig b/drivers/pinctrl/mvebu/Kconfig
> > > > index 7c51d138c8b..0b2be88e3a1 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/pinctrl/mvebu/Kconfig
> > > > +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/mvebu/Kconfig
> > > > @@ -7,6 +7,10 @@ config PINCTRL_ARMADA_38X
> > > >  	   Support pin multiplexing and pin configuration control on
> > > >  	   Marvell's Armada-38x SoC.
> > > >  
> > > > +config SPL_PINCTRL_ARMADA_38X
> > > > +	def_bool n  # Armada 38x pin control driver (SPL)
> > > > +	depends on SPL && ARMADA_38X && SPL_PINCTRL_FULL
> > > > +
> > > >  config PINCTRL_ARMADA_37XX
> > > >  	depends on ARMADA_3700 && PINCTRL_FULL
> > > >  	bool "Armada 37xx pin control driver"
> > 
> > Looking at the code in question, it's because in
> > drivers/gpio/mvebu_gpio.c we conditionally not set request / rfree
> > dm_gpio_ops because turris_omnia (only platform in question) does not
> > set pinctrl in SPL, but does set SPL_DM_GPIO. So the question I have, is
> > all of that intentional and used today, in SPL, on the platform? I guess
> > some set/get directions / values, to check board revs or something?
> 
> I think this is because no A38x board use DM pinctrl framework for
> configuring pin muxing. All boards set pin muxing in open coded board
> function which directly touch HW registers. DM pinctrl driver for A38x
> is relatively new and I think nobody converted any board to use it for
> initialization.

I do see that turris_omnia builds the pinctrl driver for full U-Boot
today.  But, does that mean that at some point in the future it should
be converted to use SPL_PINCTRL ? As that would imply that we do not
need / want SPL_PINCTRL_ARMADA_38X added (I suspect SPL_PINCTRL_STMFX
and SPL_PINCTRL_ROCKCHIP are wrong) as it will be handled like the
majority of other platforms in this area.

-- 
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 659 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20230130/329128c6/attachment.sig>