[PATCH v4 06/45] x86: Tidy up EFI code in interrupt_init()

[Simon Glass]

The ll_boot_init() check handles the EFI case so we don't need the rest
of the code. Drop it.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org>
---

(no changes since v1)

 arch/x86/cpu/i386/interrupt.c | 17 +++++------------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/cpu/i386/interrupt.c b/arch/x86/cpu/i386/interrupt.c
index fae2544c456f..f3f3527237f2 100644
--- a/arch/x86/cpu/i386/interrupt.c
+++ b/arch/x86/cpu/i386/interrupt.c
@@ -266,6 +266,10 @@ int interrupt_init(void)
 	struct udevice *dev;
 	int ret;
 
+	/*
+	 * When running as an EFI application we are not in control of
+	 * interrupts and should leave them alone.
+	 */
 	if (!ll_boot_init())
 		return 0;
 
@@ -274,11 +278,6 @@ int interrupt_init(void)
 	if (ret && ret != -ENODEV)
 		return ret;
 
-	/*
-	 * When running as an EFI application we are not in control of
-	 * interrupts and should leave them alone.
-	 */
-#ifndef CONFIG_EFI_APP
 	/* Just in case... */
 	disable_interrupts();
 
@@ -294,14 +293,8 @@ int interrupt_init(void)
 	/* Initialize core interrupt and exception functionality of CPU */
 	cpu_init_interrupts();
 
-	/*
-	 * It is now safe to enable interrupts.
-	 *
-	 * TODO(sjg at chromium.org): But we don't handle these correctly when
-	 * booted from EFI.
-	 */
+	/* It is now safe to enable interrupts */
 	enable_interrupts();
-#endif
 
 	return 0;
 }
-- 
2.41.0.162.gfafddb0af9-goog