[PATCH 2/6] ARM: at91: Switch sama5d2_icp_mmc to simple malloc in SPL

[Eugen Hristev]

On 6/26/23 11:52, Marek Vasut wrote:
> To avoid SRAM overflow in the SPL build, use simple malloc implementation.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex at denx.de>
> ---
> Cc: Eugen Hristev <eugen.hristev at collabora.com>
> ---
>   configs/sama5d2_icp_mmc_defconfig | 1 +
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/configs/sama5d2_icp_mmc_defconfig b/configs/sama5d2_icp_mmc_defconfig
> index 6b7e308680e..185694d4319 100644
> --- a/configs/sama5d2_icp_mmc_defconfig
> +++ b/configs/sama5d2_icp_mmc_defconfig
> @@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ CONFIG_SPL_MAX_SIZE=0x10000
>   CONFIG_SPL_HAS_BSS_LINKER_SECTION=y
>   CONFIG_SPL_BSS_START_ADDR=0x20000000
>   CONFIG_SPL_BSS_MAX_SIZE=0x80000
> +CONFIG_SPL_SYS_MALLOC_SIMPLE=y
>   # CONFIG_SPL_SHARES_INIT_SP_ADDR is not set
>   CONFIG_SYS_SPL_MALLOC=y
>   CONFIG_SYS_SPL_MALLOC_SIZE=0x80000

why is the email patch arriving after patch was already applied? not to 
say that it was applied so fast and without going through at91 tree.