[PATCH v3] dt-bindings: riscv: deprecate riscv,isa
Palmer Dabbelt
palmer at dabbelt.com
Thu Jun 29 05:19:38 CEST 2023
On Wed, 28 Jun 2023 08:31:32 PDT (-0700), apatel at ventanamicro.com wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 7:46 PM Palmer Dabbelt <palmer at dabbelt.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, 27 Jun 2023 08:49:06 PDT (-0700), Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
>> > On Mon, 26 Jun 2023 23:52:06 PDT (-0700), apatel at ventanamicro.com wrote:
>> >> On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 1:23 AM Palmer Dabbelt <palmer at rivosinc.com> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> On Mon, 26 Jun 2023 10:38:43 PDT (-0700), apatel at ventanamicro.com wrote:
>> >>> > On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 3:42 PM Conor Dooley <conor.dooley at microchip.com> wrote:
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> intro
>> >>> >> =====
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> When the RISC-V dt-bindings were accepted upstream in Linux, the base
>> >>> >> ISA etc had yet to be ratified. By the ratification of the base ISA,
>> >>> >> incompatible changes had snuck into the specifications - for example the
>> >>> >> Zicsr and Zifencei extensions were spun out of the base ISA.
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> Fast forward to today, and the reason for this patch.
>> >>> >> Currently the riscv,isa dt property permits only a specific subset of
>> >>> >> the ISA string - in particular it excludes version numbering.
>> >>> >> With the current constraints, it is not possible to discern whether
>> >>> >> "rv64i" means that the hart supports the fence.i instruction, for
>> >>> >> example.
>> >>> >> Future systems may choose to implement their own instruction fencing,
>> >>> >> perhaps using a vendor extension, or they may not implement the optional
>> >>> >> counter extensions. Software needs a way to determine this.
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> versioning schemes
>> >>> >> ==================
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> "Use the extension versions that are described in the ISA manual" you
>> >>> >> may say, and it's not like this has not been considered.
>> >>> >> Firstly, software that parses the riscv,isa property at runtime will
>> >>> >> need to contain a lookup table of some sort that maps arbitrary versions
>> >>> >> to versions it understands. There is not a consistent application of
>> >>> >> version number applied to extensions, with a higgledy-piggledy
>> >>> >> collection of tags, "bare" and versioned documents awaiting the reader
>> >>> >> on the "recently ratified extensions" page:
>> >>> >> https://wiki.riscv.org/display/HOME/Recently+Ratified+Extensions
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> As an aside, and this is reflected in the patch too, since many
>> >>> >> extensions have yet to appear in a release of the ISA specs,
>> >>> >> they are defined by commits in their respective "working draft"
>> >>> >> repositories.
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> Secondly, there is an issue of backwards compatibility, whereby allowing
>> >>> >> numbers in the ISA string, some parsers may be broken. This would
>> >>> >> require an additional property to be created to even use the versions in
>> >>> >> this manner.
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> ~boolean properties~ string array property
>> >>> >> ==========================================
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> If a new property is needed, the whole approach may as well be looked at
>> >>> >> from the bottom up. A string with limited character choices etc is
>> >>> >> hardly the best approach for communicating extension information to
>> >>> >> software.
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> Switching to using properties that are defined on a per extension basis,
>> >>> >> allows us to define explicit meanings for the DT representation of each
>> >>> >> extension - rather than the current situation where different operating
>> >>> >> systems or other bits of software may impart different meanings to
>> >>> >> characters in the string.
>> >>> >> Clearly the best source of meanings is the specifications themselves,
>> >>> >> this just provides us the ability to choose at what point in time the
>> >>> >> meaning is set. If an extension changes incompatibility in the future,
>> >>> >> a new property will be required.
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> Off-list, some of the RVI folks have committed to shoring up the wording
>> >>> >> in either the ISA specifications, the riscv-isa-manual or
>> >>> >> so that in the future, modifications to and additions or removals of
>> >>> >> features will require a new extension. Codifying that assertion
>> >>> >> somewhere would make it quite unlikely that compatibility would be
>> >>> >> broken, but we have the tools required to deal with it, if & when it
>> >>> >> crops up.
>> >>> >> It is in our collective interest, as consumers of extension meanings, to
>> >>> >> define a scheme that enforces compatibility.
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> The use of individual properties, rather than elements in a single
>> >>> >> string, will also permit validation that the properties have a meaning,
>> >>> >> as well as potentially reject mutually exclusive combinations, or
>> >>> >> enforce dependencies between extensions. That would not have be possible
>> >>> >> with the current dt-schema infrastructure for arbitrary strings, as we
>> >>> >> would need to add a riscv,isa parser to dt-validate!
>> >>> >> That's not implemented in this patch, but rather left as future work (for
>> >>> >> the brave, or the foolish).
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> acpi
>> >>> >> ====
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> The current ACPI ECR is based on having a single ISA string unfortunately,
>> >>> >> but ideally ACPI will move to another method, perhaps GUIDs, that give
>> >>> >> explicit meaning to extensions.
>> >>> >
>> >>> > Drop this paragraph on ACPI.
>> >>> >
>> >>> > We clearly mentioned previously that ACPI will follow specs defined by RVI.
>> >>> > There are scalability issues in using GUIDs for each ISA extension.
>> >>>
>> >>> Which spec are we following for the ACPI ISA string?
>> >>
>> >> ACPI RHCT follows the "ISA Extension Naming Conventions"
>> >> defined by the RISC-V unpriv spec. I understand that there are
>> >> unresolved issues in the "ISA Extension Naming Conventions"
>> >> which should be addressed by RVI and we should also try our
>> >> best to have this fixed in the spec.
>> >
>> > Which version of the spec? We've had a ton of issues related to
>> > versioning everywhere else the ISA string has been used, we need to know
>> > specifically which version we're parsing in order to do anything
>> > meaningful with it.
>>
>> Anup: Can you please provide a pointer to the spec this is supposed to
>> implement? I don't want to end up in the same spot again where we're
>> presuming some spec changes, we've got to support whatever we merge no
>> matter what happens on the spec side.
>>
>> In theory I'm on vacation today, but I'll try and look at the thread
>> again tonight when I get back.
>
> It is the "Chapter 29. ISA Extension Naming Conventions" of the
> RISC-V unpriv specification.
> (https://github.com/riscv/riscv-isa-manual/releases/download/riscv-isa-release-1239329-2023-05-23/unpriv-isa-asciidoc.pdf)
>
> The RISC-V unpriv specification is only a collection of extensions
> hence it does not have its own version.
There's a version right on the front page, it says "Version ASCIIDOC
Conversion, 12/2022". There's a few with that version, but versioning
is pretty broken in RISC-V land so we've mostly just started running
with the commits/tags.
It also says it's a pre release version, but if that's what ACPI is
using then I'm fine with it -- the key is that whatever we're supporting
we're stuck with, as we have to maintain compatibility here.
> We should work with RVI to address the concerns/clarifications
> that we need in "Chapter 29. ISA Extension Naming Conventions".
>
> We can also create GitHub issues for unpriv spec if that helps.
The nice thing about starting with a new interface is that there's
nothing to be compatible with, so there's no issues. Given what a mess
ISA strings have been everywhere else I'm sure we'll have some, but
that's problem for later.
I couldn't find anywhere else this was written down, so I started an
ACPI doc -- as usual maybe a bit odd for just the one thing, but we
usually end up with more.
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230629031705.15575-1-palmer@rivosinc.com/
> Regards,
> Anup
>
>>
>> >> In any case, ACPI spec is owned by UEFI forum so it does
>> >> not make sense to define/recommend anything for ACPI in
>> >> DT bindings.
>> >
>> > Unless I missed something this is just a long commit message, it's not
>> > even in the docs. If you don't want the DT side to even mention ACPI
>> > that's fine with me, though, I don't really care.
>> >
>> >>
>> >> Regards,
>> >> Anup
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>>
>> >>> > Regards,
>> >>> > Anup
>> >>> >
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> parser simplicity
>> >>> >> =================
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> Many systems that parse DT at runtime already implement an function that
>> >>> >> can check for the presence of a string in an array of string, as it is
>> >>> >> similar to the process for parsing a list of compatible strings, so a
>> >>> >> bunch of new, custom, DT parsing should not be needed.
>> >>> >> Getting rid of "riscv,isa" parsing would be a nice simplification, but
>> >>> >> unfortunately for backwards compatibility with old dtbs, existing
>> >>> >> parsers may not be removable - which may greatly simplify
>> >>> >> dt parsing code. In Linux, for example, checking for whether a hart
>> >>> >> supports an extension becomes as simple as:
>> >>> >> of_property_match_string(node, "riscv,isa-extensions", "zicbom")
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> vendor extensions
>> >>> >> =================
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> Compared to riscv,isa, this proposed scheme promotes vendor extensions,
>> >>> >> oft touted as the strength of RISC-V, to first-class citizens.
>> >>> >> At present, extensions are defined as meaning what the RISC-V ISA
>> >>> >> specifications say they do. There is no realistic way of using that
>> >>> >> interface to provide cross-platform definitions for what vendor
>> >>> >> extensions mean. Vendor extensions may also have even less consistency
>> >>> >> than RVI do in terms of versioning, or no care about backwards
>> >>> >> compatibility.
>> >>> >> The new property allows us to assign explicit meanings on a per vendor
>> >>> >> extension basis, backed up by a description of their meanings.
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> fin
>> >>> >> ===
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> Create a new file to store the extension meanings and a new
>> >>> >> riscv,isa-base property to replace the aspect of riscv,isa that is
>> >>> >> not represented by the new property - the base ISA implemented by a hart.
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> As a starting point, add properties for extensions currently used in
>> >>> >> Linux.
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> Finally, mark riscv,isa as deprecated, as removing support for it in
>> >>> >> existing programs would be an ABI break.
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> CC: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer at dabbelt.com>
>> >>> >> CC: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley at sifive.com>
>> >>> >> CC: Rob Herring <robh+dt at kernel.org>
>> >>> >> CC: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt at linaro.org>
>> >>> >> CC: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis at wdc.com>
>> >>> >> CC: Andrew Jones <ajones at ventanamicro.com>
>> >>> >> CC: Anup Patel <apatel at ventanamicro.com>
>> >>> >> CC: Atish Patra <atishp at atishpatra.org>
>> >>> >> CC: Jessica Clarke <jrtc27 at jrtc27.com>
>> >>> >> CC: Rick Chen <rick at andestech.com>
>> >>> >> CC: Leo <ycliang at andestech.com>
>> >>> >> CC: Oleksii <oleksii.kurochko at gmail.com>
>> >>> >> CC: linux-riscv at lists.infradead.org
>> >>> >> CC: qemu-riscv at nongnu.org
>> >>> >> CC: u-boot at lists.denx.de
>> >>> >> CC: devicetree at vger.kernel.org
>> >>> >> CC: linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org
>> >>> >> Reviewed-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer at rivosinc.com>
>> >>> >> Acked-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer at rivosinc.com>
>> >>> >> Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley at microchip.com>
>> >>> >> ---
>> >>> >> Changes in v3:
>> >>> >> - Per Rob's suggestion, switch to an array of strings. Cuts down on the
>> >>> >> size, compared to booleans. It has a standard mechanism for parsing
>> >>> >> (you need to parse arrays of strings for compatibles). It still allows
>> >>> >> for having a limited set of explicitly defined properties - so the
>> >>> >> advantages over a free-form string still apply.
>> >>> >> - Pick up Palmer's Ack and Review (although I expect that he will be the
>> >>> >> one to apply this).
>> >>> >> ---
>> >>> >> .../devicetree/bindings/riscv/cpus.yaml | 43 ++-
>> >>> >> .../devicetree/bindings/riscv/extensions.yaml | 245 ++++++++++++++++++
>> >>> >> 2 files changed, 265 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>> >>> >> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/extensions.yaml
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/cpus.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/cpus.yaml
>> >>> >> index 67bd239ead0b..74bc92591086 100644
>> >>> >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/cpus.yaml
>> >>> >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/cpus.yaml
>> >>> >> @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ description: |
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> allOf:
>> >>> >> - $ref: /schemas/cpu.yaml#
>> >>> >> + - $ref: extensions.yaml
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> properties:
>> >>> >> compatible:
>> >>> >> @@ -82,25 +83,6 @@ properties:
>> >>> >> description:
>> >>> >> The blocksize in bytes for the Zicboz cache operations.
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> - riscv,isa:
>> >>> >> - description:
>> >>> >> - Identifies the specific RISC-V instruction set architecture
>> >>> >> - supported by the hart. These are documented in the RISC-V
>> >>> >> - User-Level ISA document, available from
>> >>> >> - https://riscv.org/specifications/
>> >>> >> -
>> >>> >> - Due to revisions of the ISA specification, some deviations
>> >>> >> - have arisen over time.
>> >>> >> - Notably, riscv,isa was defined prior to the creation of the
>> >>> >> - Zicntr, Zicsr, Zifencei and Zihpm extensions and thus "i"
>> >>> >> - implies "zicntr_zicsr_zifencei_zihpm".
>> >>> >> -
>> >>> >> - While the isa strings in ISA specification are case
>> >>> >> - insensitive, letters in the riscv,isa string must be all
>> >>> >> - lowercase.
>> >>> >> - $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/string
>> >>> >> - pattern: ^rv(?:64|32)imaf?d?q?c?b?k?j?p?v?h?(?:[hsxz](?:[a-z])+)?(?:_[hsxz](?:[a-z])+)*$
>> >>> >> -
>> >>> >> # RISC-V has multiple properties for cache op block sizes as the sizes
>> >>> >> # differ between individual CBO extensions
>> >>> >> cache-op-block-size: false
>> >>> >> @@ -139,8 +121,17 @@ properties:
>> >>> >> DMIPS/MHz, relative to highest capacity-dmips-mhz
>> >>> >> in the system.
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> +oneOf:
>> >>> >> + - required:
>> >>> >> + - riscv,isa
>> >>> >> + - required:
>> >>> >> + - riscv,isa-base
>> >>> >> +
>> >>> >> +dependencies:
>> >>> >> + riscv,isa-base: [ "riscv,isa-extensions" ]
>> >>> >> + riscv,isa-extensions: [ "riscv,isa-base" ]
>> >>> >> +
>> >>> >> required:
>> >>> >> - - riscv,isa
>> >>> >> - interrupt-controller
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> unevaluatedProperties: false
>> >>> >> @@ -160,7 +151,9 @@ examples:
>> >>> >> i-cache-sets = <128>;
>> >>> >> i-cache-size = <16384>;
>> >>> >> reg = <0>;
>> >>> >> - riscv,isa = "rv64imac";
>> >>> >> + riscv,isa-base = "rv64i";
>> >>> >> + riscv,isa-extensions = "i", "m", "a", "c";
>> >>> >> +
>> >>> >> cpu_intc0: interrupt-controller {
>> >>> >> #interrupt-cells = <1>;
>> >>> >> compatible = "riscv,cpu-intc";
>> >>> >> @@ -183,8 +176,10 @@ examples:
>> >>> >> i-tlb-size = <32>;
>> >>> >> mmu-type = "riscv,sv39";
>> >>> >> reg = <1>;
>> >>> >> - riscv,isa = "rv64imafdc";
>> >>> >> tlb-split;
>> >>> >> + riscv,isa-base = "rv64i";
>> >>> >> + riscv,isa-extensions = "i", "m", "a", "f", "d", "c";
>> >>> >> +
>> >>> >> cpu_intc1: interrupt-controller {
>> >>> >> #interrupt-cells = <1>;
>> >>> >> compatible = "riscv,cpu-intc";
>> >>> >> @@ -202,8 +197,10 @@ examples:
>> >>> >> device_type = "cpu";
>> >>> >> reg = <0>;
>> >>> >> compatible = "riscv";
>> >>> >> - riscv,isa = "rv64imafdc";
>> >>> >> mmu-type = "riscv,sv48";
>> >>> >> + riscv,isa-base = "rv64i";
>> >>> >> + riscv,isa-extensions = "i", "m", "a", "f", "d", "c";
>> >>> >> +
>> >>> >> interrupt-controller {
>> >>> >> #interrupt-cells = <1>;
>> >>> >> interrupt-controller;
>> >>> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/extensions.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/extensions.yaml
>> >>> >> new file mode 100644
>> >>> >> index 000000000000..af98307f2c2c
>> >>> >> --- /dev/null
>> >>> >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/extensions.yaml
>> >>> >> @@ -0,0 +1,245 @@
>> >>> >> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR MIT)
>> >>> >> +%YAML 1.2
>> >>> >> +---
>> >>> >> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/riscv/extensions.yaml#
>> >>> >> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
>> >>> >> +
>> >>> >> +title: RISC-V ISA extensions
>> >>> >> +
>> >>> >> +maintainers:
>> >>> >> + - Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley at sifive.com>
>> >>> >> + - Palmer Dabbelt <palmer at sifive.com>
>> >>> >> + - Conor Dooley <conor at kernel.org>
>> >>> >> +
>> >>> >> +description: |
>> >>> >> + RISC-V has a large number of extensions, some of which are "standard"
>> >>> >> + extensions, meaning they are ratified by RISC-V International, and others
>> >>> >> + are "vendor" extensions.
>> >>> >> + This document defines properties that indicate whether a hart supports a
>> >>> >> + given extension.
>> >>> >> +
>> >>> >> + Once a standard extension has been ratified, no changes in behaviour can be
>> >>> >> + made without the creation of a new extension.
>> >>> >> + The properties for standard extensions therefore map to their originally
>> >>> >> + ratified states, with the exception of the I, Zicntr & Zihpm extensions.
>> >>> >> + See the "i" property for more information.
>> >>> >> +
>> >>> >> +select:
>> >>> >> + properties:
>> >>> >> + compatible:
>> >>> >> + contains:
>> >>> >> + const: riscv
>> >>> >> +
>> >>> >> +properties:
>> >>> >> + riscv,isa:
>> >>> >> + description:
>> >>> >> + Identifies the specific RISC-V instruction set architecture
>> >>> >> + supported by the hart. These are documented in the RISC-V
>> >>> >> + User-Level ISA document, available from
>> >>> >> + https://riscv.org/specifications/
>> >>> >> +
>> >>> >> + Due to revisions of the ISA specification, some deviations
>> >>> >> + have arisen over time.
>> >>> >> + Notably, riscv,isa was defined prior to the creation of the
>> >>> >> + Zicntr, Zicsr, Zifencei and Zihpm extensions and thus "i"
>> >>> >> + implies "zicntr_zicsr_zifencei_zihpm".
>> >>> >> +
>> >>> >> + While the isa strings in ISA specification are case
>> >>> >> + insensitive, letters in the riscv,isa string must be all
>> >>> >> + lowercase.
>> >>> >> + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/string
>> >>> >> + pattern: ^rv(?:64|32)imaf?d?q?c?b?k?j?p?v?h?(?:[hsxz](?:[a-z])+)?(?:_[hsxz](?:[a-z])+)*$
>> >>> >> + deprecated: true
>> >>> >> +
>> >>> >> + riscv,isa-base:
>> >>> >> + description:
>> >>> >> + The base ISA implemented by this hart, as described by the 20191213
>> >>> >> + version of the unprivileged ISA specification.
>> >>> >> + enum:
>> >>> >> + - rv32i
>> >>> >> + - rv64i
>> >>> >> +
>> >>> >> + riscv,isa-extensions:
>> >>> >> + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/string-array
>> >>> >> + minItems: 1
>> >>> >> + description: Extensions supported by the hart.
>> >>> >> + items:
>> >>> >> + anyOf:
>> >>> >> + # single letter extensions, in canonical order
>> >>> >> + - const: i
>> >>> >> + description: |
>> >>> >> + The base integer instruction set, as ratified in the 20191213
>> >>> >> + version of the unprivileged ISA specification, with the exception of
>> >>> >> + counter access.
>> >>> >> + Counter access was removed after the ratification of the 20191213
>> >>> >> + version of the unprivileged specification and shunted into the
>> >>> >> + Zicntr and Zihpm extensions.
>> >>> >> +
>> >>> >> + - const: m
>> >>> >> + description:
>> >>> >> + The standard M extension for integer multiplication and division, as
>> >>> >> + ratified in the 20191213 version of the unprivileged ISA
>> >>> >> + specification.
>> >>> >> +
>> >>> >> + - const: a
>> >>> >> + description:
>> >>> >> + The standard A extension for atomic instructions, as ratified in the
>> >>> >> + 20191213 version of the unprivileged ISA specification.
>> >>> >> +
>> >>> >> + - const: f
>> >>> >> + description:
>> >>> >> + The standard F extension for single-precision floating point, as
>> >>> >> + ratified in the 20191213 version of the unprivileged ISA
>> >>> >> + specification.
>> >>> >> +
>> >>> >> + - const: d
>> >>> >> + description:
>> >>> >> + The standard D extension for double-precision floating-point, as
>> >>> >> + ratified in the 20191213 version of the unprivileged ISA
>> >>> >> + specification.
>> >>> >> +
>> >>> >> + - const: q
>> >>> >> + description:
>> >>> >> + The standard Q extension for quad-precision floating-point, as
>> >>> >> + ratified in the 20191213 version of the unprivileged ISA
>> >>> >> + specification.
>> >>> >> +
>> >>> >> + - const: c
>> >>> >> + description:
>> >>> >> + The standard C extension for compressed instructions, as ratified in
>> >>> >> + the 20191213 version of the unprivileged ISA specification.
>> >>> >> +
>> >>> >> + - const: v
>> >>> >> + description:
>> >>> >> + The standard V extension for vector operations, as ratified
>> >>> >> + in-and-around commit 7a6c8ae ("Fix text that describes vfmv.v.f
>> >>> >> + encoding") of the riscv-v-spec.
>> >>> >> +
>> >>> >> + - const: h
>> >>> >> + description:
>> >>> >> + The standard H extension for hypervisors as ratified in the 20191213
>> >>> >> + version of the privileged ISA specification.
>> >>> >> +
>> >>> >> + # multi-letter extensions, sorted alphanumerically
>> >>> >> + - const: smaia
>> >>> >> + description: |
>> >>> >> + The standard Smaia supervisor-level extension for the advanced
>> >>> >> + interrupt architecture for machine-mode-visible csr and behavioural
>> >>> >> + changes to interrupts as frozen at commit ccbddab ("Merge pull
>> >>> >> + request #42 from riscv/jhauser-2023-RC4") of riscv-aia.
>> >>> >> +
>> >>> >> + - const: ssaia
>> >>> >> + description: |
>> >>> >> + The standard Ssaia supervisor-level extension for the advanced
>> >>> >> + interrupt architecture for supervisor-mode-visible csr and
>> >>> >> + behavioural changes to interrupts as frozen at commit ccbddab
>> >>> >> + ("Merge pull request #42 from riscv/jhauser-2023-RC4") of riscv-aia.
>> >>> >> +
>> >>> >> + - const: sscofpmf
>> >>> >> + description: |
>> >>> >> + The standard Sscofpmf supervisor-level extension for count overflow
>> >>> >> + and mode-based filtering as ratified at commit 01d1df0 ("Add ability
>> >>> >> + to manually trigger workflow. (#2)") of riscv-count-overflow.
>> >>> >> +
>> >>> >> + - const: sstc
>> >>> >> + description: |
>> >>> >> + The standard Sstc supervisor-level extension for time compare as
>> >>> >> + ratified at commit 3f9ed34 ("Add ability to manually trigger
>> >>> >> + workflow. (#2)") of riscv-time-compare.
>> >>> >> +
>> >>> >> + - const: svinval
>> >>> >> + description:
>> >>> >> + The standard Svinval supervisor-level extension for fine-grained
>> >>> >> + address-translation cache invalidation as ratified in the 20191213
>> >>> >> + version of the privileged ISA specification.
>> >>> >> +
>> >>> >> + - const: svnapot
>> >>> >> + description:
>> >>> >> + The standard Svnapot supervisor-level extensions for napot
>> >>> >> + translation contiguity as ratified in the 20191213 version of the
>> >>> >> + privileged ISA specification.
>> >>> >> +
>> >>> >> + - const: svpbmt
>> >>> >> + description:
>> >>> >> + The standard Svpbmt supervisor-level extensions for page-based
>> >>> >> + memory types as ratified in the 20191213 version of the privileged
>> >>> >> + ISA specification.
>> >>> >> +
>> >>> >> + - const: zba
>> >>> >> + description: |
>> >>> >> + The standard Zba bit-manipulation extension for address generation
>> >>> >> + acceleration instructions as ratified at commit 6d33919 ("Merge pull
>> >>> >> + request #158 from hirooih/clmul-fix-loop-end-condition") of
>> >>> >> + riscv-bitmanip.
>> >>> >> +
>> >>> >> + - const: zbb
>> >>> >> + description: |
>> >>> >> + The standard Zbb bit-manipulation extension for basic bit-manipulation
>> >>> >> + as ratified at commit 6d33919 ("Merge pull request #158 from
>> >>> >> + hirooih/clmul-fix-loop-end-condition") of riscv-bitmanip.
>> >>> >> +
>> >>> >> + - const: zbc
>> >>> >> + description: |
>> >>> >> + The standard Zbc bit-manipulation extension for carry-less
>> >>> >> + multiplication as ratified at commit 6d33919 ("Merge pull request
>> >>> >> + #158 from hirooih/clmul-fix-loop-end-condition") of riscv-bitmanip.
>> >>> >> +
>> >>> >> + - const: zbs
>> >>> >> + description: |
>> >>> >> + The standard Zbs bit-manipulation extension for single-bit
>> >>> >> + instructions as ratified at commit 6d33919 ("Merge pull request #158
>> >>> >> + from hirooih/clmul-fix-loop-end-condition") of riscv-bitmanip.
>> >>> >> +
>> >>> >> + - const: zicbom
>> >>> >> + description:
>> >>> >> + The standard Zicbom extension for base cache management operations as
>> >>> >> + ratified in commit 3dd606f ("Create cmobase-v1.0.pdf") of riscv-CMOs.
>> >>> >> +
>> >>> >> + - const: zicbop
>> >>> >> + description:
>> >>> >> + The standard Zicbop extension for cache-block prefetch instructions
>> >>> >> + as ratified in commit 3dd606f ("Create cmobase-v1.0.pdf") of
>> >>> >> + riscv-CMOs.
>> >>> >> +
>> >>> >> + - const: zicboz
>> >>> >> + description:
>> >>> >> + The standard Zicboz extension for cache-block zeroing as ratified
>> >>> >> + in commit 3dd606f ("Create cmobase-v1.0.pdf") of riscv-CMOs.
>> >>> >> +
>> >>> >> + - const: zicntr
>> >>> >> + description:
>> >>> >> + The standard Zicntr extension for base counters and timers, as
>> >>> >> + ratified in the 20191213 version of the unprivileged ISA
>> >>> >> + specification.
>> >>> >> +
>> >>> >> + - const: zicsr
>> >>> >> + description:
>> >>> >> + The standard Zicsr extension for control and status register
>> >>> >> + instructions, as ratified in the 20191213 version of the
>> >>> >> + unprivileged ISA specification.
>> >>> >> +
>> >>> >> + - const: zifencei
>> >>> >> + description:
>> >>> >> + The standard Zifencei extension for instruction-fetch fence, as
>> >>> >> + ratified in the 20191213 version of the unprivileged ISA
>> >>> >> + specification.
>> >>> >> +
>> >>> >> + - const: zihintpause
>> >>> >> + description:
>> >>> >> + The standard Zihintpause extension for pause hints, as ratified in
>> >>> >> + commit d8ab5c7 ("Zihintpause is ratified") of the riscv-isa-manual.
>> >>> >> +
>> >>> >> + - const: zihpm
>> >>> >> + description:
>> >>> >> + The standard Zihpm extension for hardware performance counters, as
>> >>> >> + ratified in the 20191213 version of the unprivileged ISA
>> >>> >> + specification.
>> >>> >> +
>> >>> >> + - const: ztso
>> >>> >> + description:
>> >>> >> + The standard Ztso extension for total store ordering, as ratified
>> >>> >> + in commit 2e5236 ("Ztso is now ratified.") of the
>> >>> >> + riscv-isa-manual.
>> >>> >> +
>> >>> >> +additionalProperties: true
>> >>> >> +...
>> >>> >> --
>> >>> >> 2.40.1
>> >>> >>
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list