v2023.07-rc5 regression: Image overlaps SPL
Fabio Estevam
festevam at gmail.com
Fri Jun 30 15:51:43 CEST 2023
On Fri, Jun 30, 2023 at 10:22 AM Fabio Estevam <festevam at gmail.com> wrote:
> Should we fix spl_end like this?
Looking at u-boot-spl.map:
0x0000000000912264 0x0 common/spl/spl.o
0x0000000000912264 . = ALIGN (0x4)
0x0000000000912264 __image_copy_end = .
.end
*(.__end)
0x0000000000912264 _image_binary_end = .
__image_copy_end is the last address of the SPL inside the internal RAM.
So shouldn't we do this instead?
--- a/common/spl/spl_legacy.c
+++ b/common/spl/spl_legacy.c
@@ -19,9 +19,17 @@
static void spl_parse_legacy_validate(uintptr_t start, uintptr_t size)
{
uintptr_t spl_start = (uintptr_t)_start;
- uintptr_t spl_end = (uintptr_t)__bss_end;
+ uintptr_t spl_end = (uintptr_t)__image_copy_end;
uintptr_t end = start + size;
Which results in:
********* start: 0x177fffc0
********* size: 0x86908
********* spl_start: 0x908000
********* spl_end: 0x912264
********* end: 0x178868c8
********* start: 0x17800000
********* size: 0x0
********* spl_start: 0x908000
********* spl_end: 0x912264
********* end: 0x17800000
and allows the boot to proceed:
U-Boot 2023.07-rc5-00012-g5fa30f2351ac-dirty (Jun 30 2023 - 10:45:40 -0300)
CPU: Freescale i.MX6DL rev1.4 at 792MHz
CPU: Industrial temperature grade (-40C to 105C) at 46C
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list