[PATCH 23/32] test: cmd: fdt: Test fdt set
Simon Glass
sjg at chromium.org
Mon Mar 6 18:53:02 CET 2023
On Wed, 1 Mar 2023 at 20:07, Marek Vasut <marek.vasut at mailbox.org> wrote:
>
> On 3/1/23 16:02, Simon Glass wrote:
> > Hi Marek,
> >
> > On Mon, 27 Feb 2023 at 12:55, Marek Vasut
> > <marek.vasut+renesas at mailbox.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> Add 'fdt set' test which works as follows:
> >> - Create fuller FDT, map it to sysmem
> >> - Set either existing property to overwrite it, or new property
> >> - Test setting both single properties as well as string and integer arrays
> >> - Test setting to non-existent nodes and aliases
> >> - Verify set values using 'fdt get value'
> >>
> >> The test case can be triggered using:
> >> "
> >> ./u-boot -Dc 'ut fdt'
> >> "
> >> To dump the full output from commands used during test, add '-v' flag.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas at mailbox.org>
> >> ---
> >> Cc: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt at canonical.com>
> >> Cc: Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org>
> >> Cc: Tom Rini <trini at konsulko.com>
> >> ---
> >> test/cmd/fdt.c | 123 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> 1 file changed, 123 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/test/cmd/fdt.c b/test/cmd/fdt.c
> >> index ae67b468b71..42d067090aa 100644
> >> --- a/test/cmd/fdt.c
> >> +++ b/test/cmd/fdt.c
> >> @@ -777,6 +777,129 @@ static int fdt_test_get_size(struct unit_test_state *uts)
> >> }
> >> FDT_TEST(fdt_test_get_size, UT_TESTF_CONSOLE_REC);
> >>
> >> +static int fdt_test_set_single(struct unit_test_state *uts,
> >> + const char *path, const char *prop,
> >> + const char *sval, int ival, bool integer)
> >
> > Please add a comment for this function.
> >
> >> +{
> >> + ut_assertok(console_record_reset_enable());
> >> + if (sval) {
> >> + ut_assertok(run_commandf("fdt set %s %s %s", path, prop, sval));
> >> + } else if (integer) {
> >> + ut_assertok(run_commandf("fdt set %s %s <%d>", path, prop, ival));
> >> + } else {
> >> + ut_assertok(run_commandf("fdt set %s %s", path, prop));
> >> + }
> >
> > Should drop {} on single-line statements - please check patman
>
> This one isn't as simple as "drop the {}" in fact, I sent a separate
> series to address that:
>
> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/list/?series=344329
Oh yes, I hit that a while back.
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org>
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list