[RFC PATCH 00/16] arm: Add Rockchip RK3588 support
Eugen Hristev
eugen.hristev at collabora.com
Mon Mar 13 16:49:22 CET 2023
On 3/13/23 17:34, Mark Kettenis wrote:
>> Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2023 17:21:05 +0200
>> From: Eugen Hristev <eugen.hristev at collabora.com>
>>
>> On 3/13/23 17:07, Mark Kettenis wrote:
>>>> Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2023 16:21:36 +0200
>>>> From: Eugen Hristev <eugen.hristev at collabora.com>
>>>>
>>>> On 3/13/23 12:00, Jonas Karlman wrote:
>>>>> On 2023-03-13 09:42, Eugen Hristev wrote:
>>>>>> On 3/13/23 00:34, Jonas Karlman wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi Eugen,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 2023-03-08 09:57, Eugen Hristev wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 1/29/23 11:04, Jonas Karlman wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-27 14:21, Jagan Teki wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 27 Jan 2023 at 05:13, Jonas Karlman <jonas at kwiboo.se> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-26 23:16, Jonas Karlman wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Jagan,
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-26 20:17, Jagan Teki wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 27 Jan 2023 at 00:33, Jonas Karlman <jonas at kwiboo.se> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-26 19:26, Jagan Teki wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Simon,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 26 Jan 2023 at 23:34, Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Jagan,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 26 Jan 2023 at 10:42, Jagan Teki <jagan at edgeble.ai> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 26 Jan 2023 at 22:28, Jonas Karlman <jonas at kwiboo.se> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Jagan,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-26 17:51, Jagan Teki wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Jonas,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 26 Jan 2023 at 04:17, Jonas Karlman <jonas at kwiboo.se> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Jagan,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-01-25 23:27, Jagan Teki wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This series support Rockchip RK3588. All the device tree files are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> synced from linux-next with the proper SHA1 mentioned in the commit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> messages.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unfortunately, the BL31 from rkbin is not compatible with U-Boot so
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it is failing to load ATF entry from SPL and hang.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Verified below BL31 versions,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bl31-v1.15
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bl31-v1.21
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bl31-v1.22
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bl31-v1.23
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bl31-v1.24
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bl31-v1.25
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bl31-v1.26
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> < snip >
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> As you can see in the logs above there is timeout waiting for data.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I managed to find the issue and have a workaround that gets me longer
>>>>>>>>>>>> in the boot process, there still seem to be other issue with the rk3588
>>>>>>>>>>>> startup.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> --------
>>>>>>>>>>>> U-Boot SPL 2023.01 (Jan 26 2023 - 22:03:00 +0000)
>>>>>>>>>>>> Trying to boot from MMC1
>>>>>>>>>>>> ## Checking hash(es) for config config-1 ... OK
>>>>>>>>>>>> ## Checking hash(es) for Image atf-1 ... sha256+ OK
>>>>>>>>>>>> ## Checking hash(es) for Image u-boot ... sha256+ OK
>>>>>>>>>>>> ## Checking hash(es) for Image fdt-1 ... sha256+ OK
>>>>>>>>>>>> ## Checking hash(es) for Image atf-2 ... sha256+ OK
>>>>>>>>>>>> ## Checking hash(es) for Image atf-3 ... sha256+ OK
>>>>>>>>>>>> INFO: Preloader serial: 2
>>>>>>>>>>>> NOTICE: BL31: v2.3():v2.3-468-ge529a2760:derrick.huang
>>>>>>>>>>>> NOTICE: BL31: Built : 09:59:49, Nov 21 2022
>>>>>>>>>>>> INFO: spec: 0x1
>>>>>>>>>>>> INFO: ext 32k is not valid
>>>>>>>>>>>> INFO: ddr: stride-en 4CH
>>>>>>>>>>>> INFO: GICv3 without legacy support detected.
>>>>>>>>>>>> INFO: ARM GICv3 driver initialized in EL3
>>>>>>>>>>>> INFO: valid_cpu_msk=0xff bcore0_rst = 0x0, bcore1_rst = 0x0
>>>>>>>>>>>> INFO: system boots from cpu-hwid-0
>>>>>>>>>>>> INFO: idle_st=0x21fff, pd_st=0x11fff9, repair_st=0xfff70001
>>>>>>>>>>>> INFO: dfs DDR fsp_params[0].freq_mhz= 2112MHz
>>>>>>>>>>>> INFO: dfs DDR fsp_params[1].freq_mhz= 528MHz
>>>>>>>>>>>> INFO: dfs DDR fsp_params[2].freq_mhz= 1068MHz
>>>>>>>>>>>> INFO: dfs DDR fsp_params[3].freq_mhz= 1560MHz
>>>>>>>>>>>> INFO: BL31: Initialising Exception Handling Framework
>>>>>>>>>>>> INFO: BL31: Initializing runtime services
>>>>>>>>>>>> WARNING: No OPTEE provided by BL2 boot loader, Booting device without OPTEE initialization. SMC`s destined for OPTEE will return SMC_UNK
>>>>>>>>>>>> ERROR: Error initializing runtime service opteed_fast
>>>>>>>>>>>> INFO: BL31: Preparing for EL3 exit to normal world
>>>>>>>>>>>> INFO: Entry point address = 0xa00000
>>>>>>>>>>>> INFO: SPSR = 0x3c9
>>>>>>>>>>>> "Synchronous Abort" handler, esr 0x96000000
>>>>>>>>>>>> elr: 0000000000a23650 lr : 0000000000a24d9c
>>>>>>>>>>>> x0 : 0000000000b7fbe8 x1 : 350003402a0003f3
>>>>>>>>>>>> x2 : 0000000000000000 x3 : 0000000000b80ff0
>>>>>>>>>>>> x4 : 0000000000b80ff0 x5 : 0000000000b80e88
>>>>>>>>>>>> x6 : 0000000000000054 x7 : 0000000000000044
>>>>>>>>>>>> x8 : 000000000000000a x9 : 0000000000000000
>>>>>>>>>>>> x10: 0000000000000034 x11: 0000000000000002
>>>>>>>>>>>> x12: 0000000000001988 x13: 0000000000b7fadc
>>>>>>>>>>>> x14: 0000000000a7e808 x15: 0000000000a7e808
>>>>>>>>>>>> x16: 0000000000000000 x17: 0000000000000000
>>>>>>>>>>>> x18: 0000000000b7fe50 x19: 0000000000b7fbe8
>>>>>>>>>>>> x20: 000000003c14dc00 x21: 000000003c14dc00
>>>>>>>>>>>> x22: 0000000000a7e808 x23: 0000000000000000
>>>>>>>>>>>> x24: 0000000000000000 x25: 0000000000000000
>>>>>>>>>>>> x26: 0000000000000000 x27: 0000000000000000
>>>>>>>>>>>> x28: 0000000000000000 x29: 0000000000b7fb80
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Code: f90013f5 f9400001 b4000201 f9400021 (f9403435)
>>>>>>>>>>>> Resetting CPU ...
>>>>>>>>>>>> --------
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> This was running on top of u-boot-dm/master 060a65e899859dcbf42049a18be20ce7118e7c0e
>>>>>>>>>>>> with some rk3568 patches and this series, see [1].
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> The last 3 commits contains workaround to issue with sdmmc clock.
>>>>>>>>>>>> dwmmc driver set sclk to (uint)-2, my workaround just adds a
>>>>>>>>>>>> fallback to default 400khz clock.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Next issue is the sync abort, looks it happens when u-boot
>>>>>>>>>>>> tries to set clock rates based on devicetree. this is the
>>>>>>>>>>>> last debug line before the crash.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> clk_set_rate(clk=0000000000b7fba8, rate=1008000000)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> With the commit at [2] I can now successfully run U-Boot proper.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Source of the two main issues to get this series to run have been the scmi clocks.
>>>>>>>>>>> Vendor u-boot first load its scmi driver before trying to set the cpu clocks.
>>>>>>>>>>> We can just remove it and leave setting a faster cpu rate to linux.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I also noticed that my sdram size series only detect the first two channels of memory,
>>>>>>>>>>> will respin a v2 of that series to add detection of all 4 channels of memory.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> [2] https://github.com/Kwiboo/u-boot-rockchip/commit/7e4fee945e725c0ec9ef3905c41ce367e77833b3
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Okay. We need to find a way to handle the clock value 400Khz
>>>>>>>>>> generically via the CLK framework or eMMC can be worth checking as it
>>>>>>>>>> doesn't involve SCMI and have a working patch set before MW. I did
>>>>>>>>>> that and was able to detect eMMC in U-Boot proper but got some issues
>>>>>>>>>> while booting from eMMC [3]
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I have an updated branch at [4] that should support booting from sdmmc and sdhci.
>>>>>>>>> Tested booting from both sd-card and emmc on my Radxa ROCK 5 Model B.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> This branch is based on u-boot/master f147aa80f52989c7455022ca1ab959e8545feccc
>>>>>>>>> and I have included some rk3568 patches and your rk3588 rfc series.
>>>>>>>>> I added a few fixup on top of that and a few additional patches, please see commit message
>>>>>>>>> for a very brief note on why the change was needed.
>>>>>>>>> Feel free to squash fixups and pick commits up to and possible including
>>>>>>>>> "board: rockchip: Sync evb-rk3568_defconfig with evb-rk3588_defconfig"
>>>>>>>>> for a v2 of this series.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The remaining sdhci patches needs a little bit more work,
>>>>>>>>> I can send a separate series with emmc patches once they are fully ready.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The last commit adds a hack to mkimage to keep the data for atf-3 embedded in the FIT.
>>>>>>>>> This ensures we do not run into problems trying to use dma from emmc into secure pmu sram.
>>>>>>>>> I think this is a more appropriate way to work around this issue, instead of patching
>>>>>>>>> u-boot spl_fit or sdhci core to use bounce buffers in a very special case.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> [4] https://github.com/Kwiboo/u-boot-rockchip/commits/rk3588-master-v2
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hello Jagan, Jonas,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I wanted to chip into this discussion, to ask whether you did anything
>>>>>>>> more on the SD clock matter ?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have been busy this past week but have now had time to take a new look
>>>>>>> at the sdmmc issue, along with completing some other fixes.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I am currently using your workaround that creates dummy clocks in the DT
>>>>>>>> and then the SD node just uses those, and it works, in the SPL, if and
>>>>>>>> only if the bootrom also loads the SPL from SD.
>>>>>>>> I tried to have the SPL inside the SPI flash, or load it to DDR using
>>>>>>>> the rockusb protocol, and then, initializing the SD-Card from SPL fails
>>>>>>>> utterly, namely, it cannot communicate with the card.
>>>>>>>> I did some changes to have the pinctrl working at SPL level, which
>>>>>>>> appears to be fine, but I would like to see what can be done about the
>>>>>>>> clocks.
>>>>>>>> Having the cru and all the required drivers at SPL level is the way to
>>>>>>>> go ? The SPL should run before SCMI is required so it should be able to
>>>>>>>> change all the clocks at the clock controller level ?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I fully agree that we should have some sort of scmi clk driver so that
>>>>>>> we can control the sdmmc clk in both SPL and U-Boot proper.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> As you have noticed the current workaround only works because bootrom
>>>>>>> leave the clocks in a working state after it has loaded TPL/SPL from
>>>>>>> the sdmmc device. When TPL/SPL is loaded from any other source it is
>>>>>>> not be possible to read from the sdmmc device in u-boot.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> After having played around with the scmi agent driver and being inspired
>>>>>>> by the dummy scmi clk driver in vendor u-boot I have managed to create
>>>>>>> something that could work. See top three commits from [5] for a working
>>>>>>> proof-of-concept.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What I did was to enable the scmi agent driver for use in u-boot proper
>>>>>>> and keeping it disabled in SPL build. Then added a new scmi clk driver
>>>>>>> that is enabled in SPL build, the rk3588 clk driver hooks the new clk
>>>>>>> driver to the scmi_clk ofnode. I only implemented the get/set rate ops
>>>>>>> for the two sdmmc clocks. With this both SPL and U-Boot proper should
>>>>>>> be able to configure the sdmmc clocks.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The initial fixes commits in that branch should hit the list soon.
>>>>>>> Will send the sdmmc related commits once I have had some time to do
>>>>>>> more testing.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [5] https://github.com/Kwiboo/u-boot-rockchip/commits/rk35xx-fixes
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Jonas,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I managed to get it working in SPL as well, with a similar code inspired
>>>>>> from the vendor tree.
>>>>>> About the solution, I am not sure whether it should be called a scmi
>>>>>> clock, and whether it should be part of clk_rk3588
>>>>>> Honestly by looking at the DT node, I find the description of the clock
>>>>>> tree wrong to begin with.
>>>>>> The SD should not have the 2 clocks tied to the scmi agent, because this
>>>>>> is true only if it's running in normal world with a secure world agent
>>>>>> that will act as a middle man. So if we are running at a higher EL, as
>>>>>> in the SPL case, the clocks should be tied directly to the CRU.
>>>>>> So the node itself is described bad IMO.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Anyway, if the node is set in stone from Linux, there isn;t much we can do.
>>>>>> I am also thinking whether we should have the SCMI enabled in SPL as
>>>>>> well, but the agent/clock should just access the CRU directly, meaning
>>>>>> to do something at the agent level :
>>>>>> #ifdef CONFIG_SPL_BUILD
>>>>>> -> access CRU
>>>>>> #else
>>>>>> -> send SCMI message
>>>>>> #endif
>>>>>> Does this make more sense ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Or have some kind of wrapper driver that would act as a dispatcher
>>>>>> depending on the SPL/proper build ?
>>>>>
>>>>> Looks like the sdmmc clock is controlled by the securecru registers and I
>>>>> expect that this can only be configured in secure world, not sure how this
>>>>> could have been modeled differently.
>>>>
>>>> Since it can work with a clock given by either scmi or securecru, I
>>>> would expect all clocks to be in the list, and the driver could start
>>>> the needed clock as per the EL level it's running into :)
>>>>
>>>> e.g.
>>>> clocks = <&scru CCLK_SD>, <&scru HCLK_SD>, <&scmi CCLK_SD>, <&scmi
>>>> HCLK_SD> , <&cru basic other clocks..>
>>>>
>>>> Just my vision of how it could be modeled
>>>
>>> That is a change to the device tree bindings. The goal is to have
>>> U-Boot use the same bindings and device tree as the official device
>>> tree (which currently is the one in mainline Linux).
>>
>> That's right. A change in the bindings (and Linux )
>
> And OpenBSD, and NetBSD, and ...
>
> The device tree bindings are ABI. You can't change them unless they
> are really relly broken.
For me, it's broken. You can't describe an SD hardware block, with
clocks given by SCMI node . It's not right. It's not like this in hardware.
It *can* be through SCMI, but it can also be via another way.
And the purpose of the ABI is to describe the hardware.
Unless we describe all of it, the description is wrong or at least
incomplete.
>
>>>>> With the approach that I took I think the normal clk framework will behave
>>>>> as such dispatcher and clock gets tied to cru in SPL.
>>>>>
>>>>> #ifdef CONFIG_SPL_BUILD
>>>>> -> bind protocol at 14 to rk3588 securecru driver -> read/write securecru regs
>>>>> #else
>>>>> -> bind protocol at 14 to scmi clk driver -> send SCMI message
>>>>> #endif
>>>>
>>>> This looks right, just that we would have to bring a lot of bloat to SPL
>>>> , firmware subsystem and things we may not want.
>>>
>>> I don't see why this would bring in a lot of bloat into SPL. The SPL
>>> device tree will grow a little bit since it will have to include the
>>> scmi nodes. And a little bit of additional code in the rk3588 clock
>>> driver. Navigating the Kconfig stuff is a bit hard, but I don't think
>>> this needs to pull in the firmware subsystem in SPL.
>>
>> When I tried this, I noticed that only the scmi agents look inside the
>> subnodes (e.g. protocol at 14) which do not have a compatible, and then
>> they bind the subnodes to a driver found by a hardcoded search for
>> 'scmi_clock'.
>> So, to get there, an agent is required, and firmware node, probed
>> firmware, probed 'scmi clock' . Then, probing it requires additional
>> things, because the agent wants a shared memory 'shmem' node, and you
>> end up also probing a SRAM area, allocating it to the space... that's
>> what I mean when I say that there might be much more bloat added than
>> just an additional clock set/get for securecru clocks.
>
> No, Jonas added code to find the clock protocol node and bind the
> clock driver to it:
>
> https://github.com/Kwiboo/u-boot-rockchip/blob/3209167d7a518291f912964186ee90f10b555084/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk_rk3588.c#L1953
While this works, I somehow dislike it.
I think the parent of the protocol at 14 should search and bind the node to
a driver, and not the clock driver.
I find it odd and might lead to weird situations, e.g. disable the cru
node or driver, then a node under firmware will no longer be probed.
I think we should respect the parent-child order of probing and not
searching through the DT for other nodes and mess with them.
>
>>>>> Naming and placement of the SPL securecru driver could be improved.
>>>>> Not sure if any other soc beside rk3588 will need this at this moment.
>>>>
>>>> securecru sounds better for me, I don't think we can have a scmi clock
>>>> fake driver like in vendor uboot, it has nothing 'scmi' about it.
>>>>
>>>>>> Meanwhile, I will test your patches to see how they work on my setup, I
>>>>>> also have some things in progress including pinctrl in SPL for the rock5b.
>>>>>> Thanks for your detailed description,
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for the hint at pinctrl, I made some updates to [5] and could verify
>>>>> that sdmmc works when booting from emmc thanks to your pinctrl commit.
>>>>> Also enabled SPI NOR and eMMC for rock5b in [6], and could do a sf probe
>>>>> and build a spi firmware image.
>>>>>
>>>>> There is an issue with non-DMA access in sdhci that requires the HACK commit
>>>>> for proper loading of atf, was hoping to disable SDMA in SPL like what is done
>>>>> using fifo-mode for sdmmc. But only first sector is read successfully then it
>>>>> fails, see below. Will take a closer look before I post eMMC series.
>>>>
>>>> In your patches, I see this :
>>>> https://github.com/Kwiboo/u-boot-rockchip/blob/rk35xx-fixes/arch/arm/dts/rk3588s-u-boot.dtsi#L61
>>>> Perhaps the fifo-mode is intended for the sdhci(emmc) and not for
>>>> sdmmc(sd-card) ? My understanding was that sdhci cannot do DMA to SRAM,
>>>> but the sdmmc can ?
>>>> one possible workaround is to have DMA to DRAM and then relocate it to
>>>> SRAM using the CPU. Having DMA disabled for the whole IP may have
>>>> downsides, but this is U-boot, we don't expect to have anything else to
>>>> do with the CPU while the DMA master works its magic, and the CPU should
>>>> be faster.
>>>>
>>>> I tested your patches together with the series I sent now
>>>> ( https://marc.info/?l=u-boot&m=167871206530072&w=2 ) and it appears to
>>>> boot correctly from SD-Card
>>>> Once you send them to the ML I can retest them.
>>>> Thanks !
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Trying to boot from MMC2
>>>>> 1
>>>>> - 0 'mmc at fe2c0000'
>>>>> - 1 'mmc at fe2e0000'
>>>>> - found
>>>>> blk_find_device: uclass_id=67, devnum=1: mmc at fe2c0000.blk, 67, 0
>>>>> blk_find_device: uclass_id=67, devnum=1: mmc at fe2e0000.blk, 67, 1
>>>>> clock is disabled (0Hz)
>>>>> clock is enabled (400000Hz)
>>>>> clk_set_rate(clk=5000d8, rate=400000)
>>>>> size=200, ptr=3b8, limit=100000: 5001b8
>>>>> clock is enabled (25000000Hz)
>>>>> clk_set_rate(clk=5000d8, rate=25000000)
>>>>> clk_set_rate(clk=5000d8, rate=25000000)
>>>>> clock is enabled (52000000Hz)
>>>>> clk_set_rate(clk=5000d8, rate=52000000)
>>>>> spl: mmc boot mode: raw
>>>>> blk_find_device: uclass_id=67, devnum=1: mmc at fe2c0000.blk, 67, 0
>>>>> blk_find_device: uclass_id=67, devnum=1: mmc at fe2e0000.blk, 67, 1
>>>>> hdr read sector 4000, count=1
>>>>> Found FIT
>>>>> size=a00, ptr=dc0, limit=100000: aligned to 5003c0
>>>>> blk_find_device: uclass_id=67, devnum=1: mmc at fe2c0000.blk, 67, 0
>>>>> blk_find_device: uclass_id=67, devnum=1: mmc at fe2e0000.blk, 67, 1
>>>>> fit read sector 4000, sectors=5, dst=5003c0, count=0, size=0xa00
>>>>> mmc_load_image_raw_sector: mmc block read error
>>>>> spl: mmc boot mode: fs
>>>>> Trying to boot from MMC1
>>>>>
>>>>> [6] https://github.com/Kwiboo/u-boot-rockchip/commits/rk3588-emmc
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Jonas
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Eugen
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>> Jonas
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>> Eugen
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>> Jonas
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> [3] https://github.com/edgeble/u-boot/commit/1389822228ac3dfe8d3cd3513db6a32a5c898b7f
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Jagan.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list