[PATCH v3 9/9] bootstd: Relax the argument requirements for bootflow scan

[Simon Glass]

Currently this does not allow the -lb flags unless CMD_BOOTFLOW_FULL is
enabled, which means that we need two separate boot commands. Relax this
to make things easier. It is only a small amount of extra code.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org>
---

(no changes since v1)

 boot/Kconfig   |  3 +--
 cmd/bootflow.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/boot/Kconfig b/boot/Kconfig
index 3bda7b5a793d..b8c1ebc4b345 100644
--- a/boot/Kconfig
+++ b/boot/Kconfig
@@ -1563,8 +1563,7 @@ config USE_BOOTCOMMAND
 config BOOTCOMMAND
 	string "bootcmd value"
 	depends on USE_BOOTCOMMAND && !USE_DEFAULT_ENV_FILE
-	default "bootflow scan -lb" if BOOTSTD_BOOTCOMMAND && CMD_BOOTFLOW_FULL
-	default "bootflow scan" if BOOTSTD_BOOTCOMMAND && !CMD_BOOTFLOW_FULL
+	default "bootflow scan -lb" if BOOTSTD_BOOTCOMMAND
 	default "run distro_bootcmd" if !BOOTSTD_BOOTCOMMAND && DISTRO_DEFAULTS
 	help
 	  This is the string of commands that will be used as bootcmd and if
diff --git a/cmd/bootflow.c b/cmd/bootflow.c
index 42f6e14a4370..c345b020070f 100644
--- a/cmd/bootflow.c
+++ b/cmd/bootflow.c
@@ -124,9 +124,19 @@ static int do_bootflow_scan(struct cmd_tbl *cmdtp, int flag, int argc,
 		if (!label)
 			dev = std->cur_bootdev;
 	} else {
+		/*
+		 * allow -b and -l (which is ignored) but complain about
+		 * anything else
+		 */
 		if (has_args) {
-			printf("Flags not supported: enable CONFIG_BOOTFLOW_FULL\n");
-			return CMD_RET_USAGE;
+			char *p;
+
+			for (p = argv[1] + 1; *p; p++) {
+				if (*p != 'b' && *p != 'l') {
+					printf("Flags not supported: enable CONFIG_BOOTFLOW_FULL\n");
+					return CMD_RET_USAGE;
+				}
+			}
 		}
 		boot = true;
 	}
-- 
2.40.0.rc1.284.g88254d51c5-goog