[PATCH v2 02/10] arm: dts: introduce j784s4 u-boot dtbs

[Tom Rini]

On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 09:10:20AM -0500, Hari Nagalla wrote:

> Introduce the base dts files needed for u-boot or to augment the linux
> dtbs for use in the u-boot-spl and u-boot binaries.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Apurva Nandan <a-nandan at ti.com>
> Signed-off-by: Hari Nagalla <hnagalla at ti.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm/dts/Makefile                        |    2 +
>  arch/arm/dts/k3-j784s4-ddr-evm-lp4-4266.dtsi | 8757 +++++++++++++++++
>  arch/arm/dts/k3-j784s4-ddr.dtsi              | 8858 ++++++++++++++++++
>  arch/arm/dts/k3-j784s4-evm-u-boot.dtsi       |  135 +
>  arch/arm/dts/k3-j784s4-r5-evm.dts            |  209 +
>  5 files changed, 17961 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 arch/arm/dts/k3-j784s4-ddr-evm-lp4-4266.dtsi
>  create mode 100644 arch/arm/dts/k3-j784s4-ddr.dtsi
>  create mode 100644 arch/arm/dts/k3-j784s4-evm-u-boot.dtsi
>  create mode 100644 arch/arm/dts/k3-j784s4-r5-evm.dts

Good news/bad news.

[snip]
> +	msmc0: msmc {
[snip]
> +		u-boot,dm-spl;

This is now "bootph-pre-ram" and gets sent upstream to Linux, as the
binding is there now. Please do that and then rework the first patch to
be a sync from -next or similar, that contains these changes.

And yes, this is the first example I found of properties that should be
bootph-* now instead, and there's some bindings you have in-progress and
so yes, will include these for now in the -u-boot.dtsi file. But others
don't, and this needs to be on top of -next and CI passing.

-- 
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 659 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20230321/89cd4181/attachment.sig>