[RFC PATCH 0/5] LWIP stack integration
Tom Rini
trini at konsulko.com
Mon May 22 16:20:48 CEST 2023
On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 04:33:57PM +0300, Ilias Apalodimas wrote:
> Hi Maxim
>
> On Mon, 22 May 2023 at 12:01, Maxim Uvarov <maxim.uvarov at linaro.org> wrote:
> >
> > My measurements for binary after LTO looks like:
> >
> > U-boot WGET | LWIP WGET + ping | LWIP WGET| diff bytes| diff %
> > 870728 | 915000 | 912560 | 41832 | 4.8
>
>
> I think you'll need to analyze that a bit more. First of all I don't
> think the '+ping' tab is useful. What is is trying to achieve?
> - How was LWIP compiled?
> - Was ipv6 supported?
> - Can we strip it down even further?
>
> In general please give as much information as you can with what we
> gain in functionality from LWIP with those extra bytes of code.
And please make sure to disable the previous support, my guess fro that
much growth is that you didn't.
--
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 659 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20230522/812d7b4a/attachment.sig>
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list