[PATCH] pinctrl: sunxi: Avoid using .bss for SPL
Andre Przywara
andre.przywara at arm.com
Wed Nov 1 13:33:12 CET 2023
On Mon, 30 Oct 2023 23:57:40 -0500
Samuel Holland <samuel at sholland.org> wrote:
> sunxi platforms put .bss in DRAM, so .bss is not available in SPL before
> DRAM controller initialization. Therefore, this buffer must be placed in
> the .data section.
Right, this results in 0 bytes of .BSS, down from 5.
Though I am wondering how much of the (SPL-)DM code gets away without
using BSS, or if we get accidental BSS additions from the framework, over
time.
But if this patch helps your SPL_DM efforts:
> Signed-off-by: Samuel Holland <samuel at sholland.org>
Reviewed-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara at arm.com>
Cheers,
Andre
> ---
>
> drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.c b/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.c
> index bdf6360f176..37ea93715d1 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.c
> @@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ static const char *sunxi_pinctrl_get_pin_name(struct udevice *dev,
> uint pin_selector)
> {
> const struct sunxi_pinctrl_desc *desc = dev_get_priv(dev);
> - static char pin_name[sizeof("PN31")];
> + static char pin_name[sizeof("PN31")] __section(".data");
>
> snprintf(pin_name, sizeof(pin_name), "P%c%d",
> pin_selector / SUNXI_GPIOS_PER_BANK + desc->first_bank + 'A',
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list