[PATCH 1/5] arm: dts: k3-am625-beagleplay-u-boot/r5: Just depend on k3-binman.dtsi

[Bryan Brattlof]

Hi Nishanth!

On November  4, 2023 thus sayeth Nishanth Menon:
> With the upcoming folder separation, there is no further need to depend
> on am625-binman.dtsi. Duplicate the existing definitions to u-boot.dtsi
> and r5.dts as appropriate.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm at ti.com>

Reviewed-by: Bryan Brattlof <bb at ti.com>

> ---
>  arch/arm/dts/k3-am625-beagleplay-u-boot.dtsi | 160 +++++++++++++++++--
>  arch/arm/dts/k3-am625-r5-beagleplay.dts      |  39 +++++
>  2 files changed, 184 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

...

> -&spl_am625_sk_dtb_unsigned {
> -	filename = SPL_AM625_BEAGLEPLAY_DTB;
> -};
> +	ti-spl_unsigned {
> +		filename = "tispl.bin_unsigned";

If all of the beagle-plays are using the GP security variant shouldn't 
we remove the _unsigned?

> +		pad-byte = <0xff>;
> +

...

> -&am625_sk_dtb_unsigned {
> -	filename = AM625_BEAGLEPLAY_DTB;
> +	u-boot_unsigned {
> +		filename = "u-boot.img_unsigned";

And here? I don't really have an opinion either way. Just curious if 
we've thought about that.

> +		pad-byte = <0xff>;
> +

~Bryan