[PATCH v1 2/2] fs: fat: calculate FAT type based on cluster count
Sean Anderson
seanga2 at gmail.com
Wed Nov 8 19:59:44 CET 2023
On 11/8/23 13:57, Sean Anderson wrote:
> On 11/8/23 07:12, christian.taedcke-oss at weidmueller.com wrote:
>> From: Christian Taedcke <christian.taedcke at weidmueller.com>
>>
>> This fixes an issue where the FAT type (FAT12, FAT16) is not
>> correctly detected, e.g. when the BPB field BS_FilSysType contains the
>> valid value "FAT ".
>>
>> According to the FAT spec the field BS_FilSysType has only
>> informational character and does not determine the FAT type.
>>
>> The logic of this code is based on the linux kernel implementation
>> from the file fs/fat/inode.c function fat_fill_super().
>>
>> For details about FAT see http://elm-chan.org/docs/fat_e.html
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Christian Taedcke <christian.taedcke at weidmueller.com>
>
> Have you run bloat-o-meter on this? FAT is used in SPL a lot.
>
> Would it be possible to write a test for this, especially for a FAT12 filesystem with
> 4084 data sectors and a FAT16 filesystem with 4085?
>
>> ---
>>
>> fs/fat/fat.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>> include/fat.h | 6 -----
>> test/image/spl_load_fs.c | 2 +-
>> 3 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/fat/fat.c b/fs/fat/fat.c
>> index 8a0f4e4e6c..9179257ff2 100644
>> --- a/fs/fat/fat.c
>> +++ b/fs/fat/fat.c
>> @@ -27,6 +27,9 @@
>> #define FATU8ARRAY2CPU16(x) (((x)[1] << 8) + (x)[0])
>> +/* maximum number of clusters for FAT12 */
>> +#define MAX_FAT12 0xFF4
>> +
>> /*
>> * Convert a string to lowercase. Converts at most 'len' characters,
>> * 'len' may be larger than the length of 'str' if 'str' is NULL
>> @@ -485,6 +488,32 @@ static __u8 mkcksum(struct nameext *nameext)
>> return ret;
>> }
>> +/*
>> + * Determine the FAT type
>> + *
>> + * Based on fat_fill_super() from the Linux kernel's fs/fat/inode.c
>> + */
>> +static int
>> +determine_fat_bits(const boot_sector *bs)
>> +{
>> + if (!bs->fat_length && bs->fat32_length) {
>> + return 32;
>> + } else {
>> + u16 fat_start = bs->reserved;
>> + u32 dir_start = fat_start + bs->fats * bs->fat_length;
>> + u32 rootdir_sectors = FATU8ARRAY2CPU16(bs->dir_entries) *
>> + sizeof(dir_entry) /
>> + FATU8ARRAY2CPU16(bs->sector_size);
>
> Note that technically we are supposed to round up.
>
>> + u32 data_start = dir_start + rootdir_sectors;
>> + u16 sectors = FATU8ARRAY2CPU16(bs->sectors);
>> + u32 total_sectors = sectors ? sectors : bs->total_sect;
>> + u32 total_clusters = (total_sectors - data_start) /
>> + bs->cluster_size;
>> +
>> + return (total_clusters > MAX_FAT12) ? 16 : 12;
>> + }
>> +}
>> +
>
> This should be merged with...
>
>> /*
>> * Read boot sector and volume info from a FAT filesystem
>> */
>> @@ -493,7 +522,6 @@ read_bootsectandvi(boot_sector *bs, volume_info *volinfo, int *fatsize)
>> {
>> __u8 *block;
>> volume_info *vistart;
>> - int ret = 0;
>> if (cur_dev == NULL) {
>> debug("Error: no device selected\n");
>> @@ -508,7 +536,8 @@ read_bootsectandvi(boot_sector *bs, volume_info *volinfo, int *fatsize)
>> if (disk_read(0, 1, block) < 0) {
>> debug("Error: reading block\n");
>> - goto fail;
>> + free(block);
>> + return -1;
>> }
>> memcpy(bs, block, sizeof(boot_sector));
>> @@ -527,33 +556,15 @@ read_bootsectandvi(boot_sector *bs, volume_info *volinfo, int *fatsize)
>> bs->info_sector = FAT2CPU16(bs->info_sector);
>> bs->backup_boot = FAT2CPU16(bs->backup_boot);
>> vistart = (volume_info *)(block + sizeof(boot_sector));
>> - *fatsize = 32;
>> } else {
>> vistart = (volume_info *)&(bs->fat32_length);
>> - *fatsize = 0;
>> }
>
> ... these if statements (above)
>
>> memcpy(volinfo, vistart, sizeof(volume_info));
>> - if (*fatsize == 32) {
>> - if (strncmp(FAT32_SIGN, vistart->fs_type, SIGNLEN) == 0)
>> - goto exit;
>> - } else {
>> - if (strncmp(FAT12_SIGN, vistart->fs_type, SIGNLEN) == 0) {
>> - *fatsize = 12;
>> - goto exit;
>> - }
>> - if (strncmp(FAT16_SIGN, vistart->fs_type, SIGNLEN) == 0) {
>> - *fatsize = 16;
>> - goto exit;
>> - }
>> - }
>
> I think we should still verify these as long as vistart->ext_boot_sign is 0x29.
To add to this, if we don't want to verify these we should at least check the heuristics from [1].
--Sean
[1] https://www.win.tue.nl/~aeb/linux/fs/fat/fat-2.html
>> + *fatsize = determine_fat_bits(bs);
>> - debug("Error: broken fs_type sign\n");
>> -fail:
>> - ret = -1;
>> -exit:
>> free(block);
>> - return ret;
>> + return 0;
>> }
>> static int get_fs_info(fsdata *mydata)
>> @@ -1158,9 +1169,8 @@ int file_fat_detectfs(void)
>> memcpy(vol_label, volinfo.volume_label, 11);
>> vol_label[11] = '\0';
>> - volinfo.fs_type[5] = '\0';
>> - printf("Filesystem: %s \"%s\"\n", volinfo.fs_type, vol_label);
>> + printf("Filesystem: FAT%d \"%s\"\n", fatsize, vol_label);
>> return 0;
>> }
>> diff --git a/include/fat.h b/include/fat.h
>> index a9756fb4cd..3dce99a23c 100644
>> --- a/include/fat.h
>> +++ b/include/fat.h
>> @@ -34,12 +34,6 @@ struct disk_partition;
>> /* Maximum number of entry for long file name according to spec */
>> #define MAX_LFN_SLOT 20
>> -/* Filesystem identifiers */
>> -#define FAT12_SIGN "FAT12 "
>> -#define FAT16_SIGN "FAT16 "
>> -#define FAT32_SIGN "FAT32 "
>> -#define SIGNLEN 8
>> -
>> /* File attributes */
>> #define ATTR_RO 1
>> #define ATTR_HIDDEN 2
>> diff --git a/test/image/spl_load_fs.c b/test/image/spl_load_fs.c
>> index 297ab08a82..90e640b5de 100644
>> --- a/test/image/spl_load_fs.c
>> +++ b/test/image/spl_load_fs.c
>> @@ -220,7 +220,7 @@ static size_t create_fat(void *dst, size_t size, const char *filename,
>> bs->root_cluster = cpu_to_le32(root_sector);
>> vi->ext_boot_sign = 0x29;
>> - memcpy(vi->fs_type, FAT32_SIGN, sizeof(vi->fs_type));
>> + memcpy(vi->fs_type, "FAT32 ", sizeof(vi->fs_type));
>> memcpy(dst + 0x1fe, "\x55\xAA", 2);
>
> --Sean
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list