[PATCH] riscv: binman: fix the load field format

[Randolph Lin]

Hi Simon,
Thanks a lot.
On Fri, Nov 10, 2023 at 04:50:24AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Randolph,
> 
> On Wed, Nov 8, 2023, 20:15 Randolph <randolph at andestech.com> wrote:
> >
> > The #address-cells is now equal to 2. The format of the load field for
> > the Linux kernel doesn't match.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Randolph <randolph at andestech.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/riscv/dts/binman.dtsi | 3 ++-
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/riscv/dts/binman.dtsi b/arch/riscv/dts/binman.dtsi
> > index 6b4eb8dc7b..5117d7c8c9 100644
> > --- a/arch/riscv/dts/binman.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/riscv/dts/binman.dtsi
> > @@ -50,7 +50,8 @@
> >                                         os = "Linux";
> >                                         arch = "riscv";
> >                                         compression = "none";
> > -                                       load = <CONFIG_TEXT_BASE>;
> > +                                       load = <U64_TO_U32_H(CONFIG_TEXT_BASE)
> > +                                               U64_TO_U32_L(CONFIG_TEXT_BASE)>;
> 
I just see the #address-cells changed from 1 to 2 in commit id: 5a348ccf0257.
In my last commit for binman.dtsi (commit id: d311df8b3169), it is based on
the value of #address-cells being 1. That's the reason for my patch submission.
> Does this work?
> 
> load = /bits 64/ <CONFIG_TEXT_BASE>
>
Yes, it works. We use this way for the DDR memory start address above 4G 
platform. We find the example for 64bit address in the document 
tools/binman/binman.rst and use it.
What is the method that we should continue to use in the binman.dtsi?
1. #address-cells = 2
2. append /bits/64 
> >
> >                                         linux_blob: blob-ext {
> >                                                 filename = "Image";
> > --
> > 2.34.1
> >
> 
> Regards,
> Simon