[PATCH 2/2] arm: dts: k3-*-binman: Move to using templated FITs

[Neha Malcom Francis]

Hi Andrew,

On 15/11/23 21:22, Andrew Davis wrote:
> On 11/15/23 4:10 AM, Neha Malcom Francis wrote:
>> Reduce redundancy in code by using templates to generate the A72 boot
>> binaries (tispl.bin and u-boot.img) as well as R5 boot binary sysfw.itb
>> (for legacy boot following devices J721E and AM65x).
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Neha Malcom Francis <n-francis at ti.com>
>> ---
>>   arch/arm/dts/k3-am625-sk-binman.dtsi          | 157 +--------
>>   .../dts/k3-am625-verdin-wifi-dev-binman.dtsi  | 155 +-------
>>   arch/arm/dts/k3-am62a-sk-binman.dtsi          | 158 +--------
>>   arch/arm/dts/k3-am64x-binman.dtsi             | 151 +-------
>>   arch/arm/dts/k3-am65x-binman.dtsi             | 273 +-------------
>>   arch/arm/dts/k3-j7200-binman.dtsi             | 159 +--------
>>   arch/arm/dts/k3-j721e-binman.dtsi             | 332 +-----------------
>>   arch/arm/dts/k3-j721s2-binman.dtsi            | 157 +--------
>>   8 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 1488 deletions(-)
> 
> 1488 deletions, nice!
> 
> Minor question, why was `ti-secure` not factored out of `dm` nodes like
> it was for `atf`/`tee` nodes? Guessing it has to do with not all SoCs
> needing this blob and signing nothing results in something, which
> messes up the 0 size check when loading it, but it wasn't clear to me.
> 

Yes that's right! It ends up being non-zero for devices that don't have DM and 
DM load fails.

> Anyway,
> 
> Acked-by: Andrew Davis <afd at ti.com>

-- 
Thanking You
Neha Malcom Francis